Hamblin J, Connor P D
Department of Family Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, USA.
Tenn Med. 1998 Jan;91(1):17-20.
The primary objective of this study was to assess cancer screening guideline preference by Tennessee internists and family physicians.
A one-page, 14-item survey was mailed to 580 internists and family physicians followed by a reminder postcard and a second survey within six weeks of the original mailing. The survey addressed physician practice characteristics, specific preferred cancer screening guidelines used, and self-evaluation of cancer screening and detection practices compared with the practice of coronary artery disease risk and prevention, depression, and obesity/adult-onset diabetes mellitus.
Internal medicine and family physicians in Tennessee.
The overall survey response rate was 57% (N = 300). Of respondents, 83.4% were male and 16.6% were female. Eighty-three percent were board-certified, 30% had subspecialty training, and 62% practiced in a solo practice or a single-specialty group. There were few differences in guideline preference between generalists and subspecialists. Approximately 52% of respondents cited American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines, 1.7% used US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines, 34% cited a compilation of various guidelines, and 10% used no guidelines. More physicians rated their treatment of depression (22.9%) or obesity/diabetes mellitus (22.0%) as poor or needing improvement than rated their screening of cancer (16.3%) and coronary artery disease (12.5%) as poor or needing improvement. Survey respondents suggested that the ACS could be most effective in lobbying against tobacco and in providing patient education pamphlets.
Most physicians report using ACS screening guidelines, rate their cancer screening practices as good or very good, and recommend that the ACS lobby against tobacco and provide patient pamphlets. This study reflects physician preference of various cancer screening guidelines. Further research is needed to determine factors influencing physician preferred guideline use as well as actual practices.
本研究的主要目的是评估田纳西州内科医生和家庭医生对癌症筛查指南的偏好。
向580名内科医生和家庭医生邮寄了一份14项内容的单页调查问卷,随后寄发提醒明信片,并在首次邮寄六周内进行第二次调查。该调查涉及医生的执业特征、所使用的具体首选癌症筛查指南,以及与冠状动脉疾病风险与预防、抑郁症和肥胖症/成人发病型糖尿病的诊疗实践相比,对癌症筛查与检测实践的自我评估。
田纳西州的内科医生和家庭医生。
调查总体回复率为57%(N = 300)。在受访者中,83.4%为男性,16.6%为女性。83%获得了委员会认证,30%接受过专科培训,62%在单人执业或单一专科小组中执业。全科医生和专科医生在指南偏好上差异不大。约52%的受访者引用了美国癌症协会(ACS)指南,1.7%使用了美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)指南,34%引用了各种指南的汇编,10%未使用任何指南。更多医生认为他们对抑郁症(22.9%)或肥胖症/糖尿病(22.0%)的治疗较差或需要改进,而认为他们对癌症(16.3%)和冠状动脉疾病(12.5%)的筛查较差或需要改进的医生较少。调查受访者建议,美国癌症协会在反对烟草游说和提供患者教育宣传册方面可能最有效。
大多数医生报告使用美国癌症协会的筛查指南,认为他们的癌症筛查实践良好或非常好,并建议美国癌症协会反对烟草游说并提供患者宣传册。本研究反映了医生对各种癌症筛查指南的偏好。需要进一步研究以确定影响医生首选指南使用以及实际诊疗实践的因素。