Suppr超能文献

对于低危B系急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童,中等剂量静脉注射甲氨蝶呤联合静脉注射巯嘌呤优于重复低剂量口服甲氨蝶呤联合静脉注射巯嘌呤:一项儿科肿瘤学组III期试验。

Intermediate-dose intravenous methotrexate with intravenous mercaptopurine is superior to repetitive low-dose oral methotrexate with intravenous mercaptopurine for children with lower-risk B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group phase III trial.

作者信息

Mahoney D H, Shuster J, Nitschke R, Lauer S J, Winick N, Steuber C P, Camitta B

机构信息

Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):246-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.246.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether early intensification with 12 courses of intravenous methotrexate and intravenous mercaptopurine (IVMTX/IVMP) is superior to 12 courses of repetitive, low-dose oral MTX with I.V. MP (LDMTX/IVMP) for prevention of relapse in children with lower-risk B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven hundred nine patients were entered onto the study. Vincristine, prednisone, and asparaginase were used for remission induction. Patients were randomized to receive intensification with either IVMTX 1,000 mg/m2 plus IVMP 1,000 mg/m2 (regimen A) or LDMTX 30 mg/m2 every 6 hours for six doses with IVMP 1,000 mg/m2 (regimen B). Twelve courses were administered at 2-week intervals. Triple intrathecal therapy (TIT) was used for CNS prophylaxis. Continuation therapy included standard oral MP, weekly MTX, and TIT every 12 weeks for 2 years.

RESULTS

Six hundred ninety-nine (99%) patients achieved remission. Three hundred forty-nine were assigned to regimen A and 350 to regimen B. The estimated 4-year continuous complete remission (CCR) rate for patients treated with regimen A is 80.3% (SE = 2.9%) and with regimen B is 75.9% (SE = 3.1%). By log-rank analysis, regimen A demonstrated superior CCR (P = .013). Transient neutropenia/thrombocytopenia, bacterial sepsis, neurotoxicity, stomatitis, and hospitalizations were more frequent among patients treated on regimen A.

CONCLUSION

Intensification with IVMTX/IVMP is more effective than LDMTX/IVMP for prevention of relapse in children with B-precursor ALL at lower risk for relapse.

摘要

目的

确定12疗程静脉注射甲氨蝶呤和静脉注射巯嘌呤(IVMTX/IVMP)早期强化治疗,是否优于12疗程重复小剂量口服甲氨蝶呤联合静脉注射巯嘌呤(LDMTX/IVMP),用于预防低危B系急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿的复发。

患者与方法

709例患者进入本研究。使用长春新碱、泼尼松和天冬酰胺酶进行缓解诱导。患者被随机分配接受强化治疗,方案为IVMTX 1000 mg/m²加IVMP 1000 mg/m²(方案A),或每6小时一次LDMTX 30 mg/m²共6剂联合IVMP 1000 mg/m²(方案B)。每2周进行12个疗程的治疗。三联鞘内治疗(TIT)用于中枢神经系统预防。维持治疗包括标准口服巯嘌呤、每周甲氨蝶呤,以及每12周进行TIT共2年。

结果

699例(99%)患者达到缓解。349例被分配至方案A,350例被分配至方案B。接受方案A治疗患者的估计4年持续完全缓解(CCR)率为80.3%(标准误=2.9%),接受方案B治疗患者的为75.9%(标准误=3.1%)。通过对数秩分析,方案A显示出更高的CCR(P = 0.013)。方案A治疗的患者中,短暂性中性粒细胞减少/血小板减少、细菌败血症、神经毒性、口腔炎和住院更为常见。

结论

对于复发风险较低的B前体ALL患儿,IVMTX/IVMP强化治疗在预防复发方面比LDMTX/IVMP更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验