Gopinath R, Nutman T B
Helminth Immunology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Cytometry. 1997 Dec 15;30(6):313-6.
The identification of eosinophils in lysed whole blood by flow cytometry can be problematic, since these cells overlap significantly with the neutrophil cluster on forward scatter versus side scatter plots of whole blood samples. Current methods can be time-consuming when running multiple samples or may compromise yield in the interests of greater accuracy. The use of eosinophil purification techniques prior to FACS analysis or sorting as a way of ensuring purity may have unpredictable effects on eosinophil activation, leading to questionable data interpretation. Here we describe a simple, single-step method for definition of eosinophils utilizing their high side scatter and CD16 fluorescence negativity to differentiate them from neutrophils. The purity of the neutrophil and eosinophil populations sorted with this gate is close to 100% regardless of the peripheral blood eosinophil count, while the population obtained by sorting on a plot of FSC/SSC was a mixture of eosinophils and neutrophils. We suggest this method as a simple, reproducible, and accurate way of defining eosinophils by flow cytometry for analysis or sorting.
通过流式细胞术在裂解全血中鉴定嗜酸性粒细胞可能存在问题,因为在全血样本的前向散射与侧向散射图上,这些细胞与中性粒细胞群有明显重叠。当前方法在运行多个样本时可能耗时,或者为了更高的准确性而可能影响产量。在荧光激活细胞分选(FACS)分析或分选之前使用嗜酸性粒细胞纯化技术以确保纯度,可能会对嗜酸性粒细胞的激活产生不可预测的影响,从而导致数据解释存在疑问。在此,我们描述一种简单的单步方法,利用嗜酸性粒细胞的高侧向散射和CD16荧光阴性来将其与中性粒细胞区分开,从而定义嗜酸性粒细胞。无论外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数如何,用此门控分选得到的中性粒细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞群体的纯度接近100%,而通过在FSC/SSC图上进行分选得到的群体是嗜酸性粒细胞和中性粒细胞的混合物。我们建议这种方法是通过流式细胞术定义嗜酸性粒细胞以进行分析或分选的一种简单、可重复且准确的方法。