Ross W A, Kaneene J B, Gardiner J C
Population Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Am J Vet Res. 1998 Jan;59(1):23-9.
To evaluate the associations of operation and individual animal-level risk factors with occurrence of lameness in the Michigan horse population.
3,925 horses monitored from 138 randomly selected Michigan operations for a total of 814,753 horse-days.
All horses monitored < 60 days were eliminated from the source population. From the remaining horses, a prospective unmatched case-control study population was generated that included all cases and a random sample of noncases. Analysis of risk factors associated with occurrence of lameness was conducted, using Cox's proportional hazards regression model.
Horses in larger operations, compared with horses in the first operation size quartile, were associated with decreased risk of lameness (2nd quartile [Q]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 0.91; 3rd Q: HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.13; 4th Q: HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.76). Compared with mares, stallions (HR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.17, 3.07) and geldings (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.09) were at increased risk of lameness. Compared with horses used for breeding purposes only, those participating in exercise or performance-related activities including racing (HR = 4.70; 95% CI: 1.70, 13.03) and showing (HR = 2.80; 95% CI: 1.07, 7.28) also were at increased risk of lameness.
Comparison of these results with those conducted using multivariable logistic regression strengthens the argument that there is decreased risk of lameness for horses in larger operations and increased risk of lameness for active horses. Additionally, results of this analysis suggested that stallions and geldings are at increased risk of lameness, compared with mares.
Lameness prevention strategies in the horse industry should focus principally on horses participating in exercise or performance-related activities, including racing and showing, on male horses, and on horses stabled in smaller operations.
评估密歇根州马匹群体中手术及个体动物层面的风险因素与跛行发生之间的关联。
从密歇根州138个随机选取的养殖场监测了3925匹马,共计814753马日。
将监测天数少于60天的所有马匹从源群体中剔除。从剩余马匹中,生成了一个前瞻性非匹配病例对照研究群体,其中包括所有病例和非病例的随机样本。使用Cox比例风险回归模型对与跛行发生相关的风险因素进行分析。
与处于第一个手术规模四分位数的养殖场中的马匹相比,大型养殖场中的马匹跛行风险降低(第二个四分位数[Q]:风险比[HR]=0.57;95%置信区间[CI]:0.36,0.91;第三个四分位数:HR=0.74;95%CI:0.49,1.13;第四个四分位数:HR=0.46;95%CI:0.28,0.76)。与母马相比,种公马(HR=1.90;95%CI:1.17,3.07)和去势公马(HR=1.46;95%CI:1.02,2.09)跛行风险增加。与仅用于繁殖目的的马匹相比,参与运动或与表演相关活动(包括赛马,HR=4.70;95%CI:1.70,13.03;以及展览,HR=2.80;95%CI:1.07,7.28)的马匹跛行风险也增加。
将这些结果与使用多变量逻辑回归得出的结果进行比较,强化了这样的观点,即大型养殖场中的马匹跛行风险降低,而活跃马匹的跛行风险增加。此外,该分析结果表明,与母马相比,种公马和去势公马跛行风险增加。
马匹行业的跛行预防策略应主要关注参与运动或与表演相关活动(包括赛马和展览)的马匹、公马以及饲养在较小养殖场的马匹。