• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾的不同定义:与医疗保健支出的关系。

Alternative definitions of disability: relationship to health-care expenditures.

作者信息

Tepper S, Sutton J, Beatty P, DeJong G

机构信息

National Rehabilitation Hospital Research Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 1997 Dec;19(12):556-8. doi: 10.3109/09638289709166050.

DOI:10.3109/09638289709166050
PMID:9442995
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between different definitions of disability and health-care expenditures in the working aged population in the United States using the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey (NMES). Five different definitions of disability were identified and the health-care expenditures for each group were compared using descriptive analyses. Results reveal that estimates of the prevalence of disability vary dramatically by the definition of disability. A more than three-fold difference in average total health-care expenditures is observed using different specifications of disability. These results suggest that estimates of health-care expenditures should be interpreted cautiously, since the definition influences the magnitude of estimates. Researchers and policy-makers should consider the standardization of the term 'disability'.

摘要

本研究旨在利用1987年全国医疗支出调查(NMES),调查美国劳动年龄人口中不同残疾定义与医疗保健支出之间的关系。确定了五种不同的残疾定义,并使用描述性分析比较了每组的医疗保健支出。结果显示,残疾患病率的估计因残疾定义的不同而有很大差异。使用不同的残疾规格,平均总医疗保健支出存在三倍以上的差异。这些结果表明,医疗保健支出的估计应谨慎解释,因为定义会影响估计的幅度。研究人员和政策制定者应考虑“残疾”一词的标准化。

相似文献

1
Alternative definitions of disability: relationship to health-care expenditures.残疾的不同定义:与医疗保健支出的关系。
Disabil Rehabil. 1997 Dec;19(12):556-8. doi: 10.3109/09638289709166050.
2
Health care expenditures of living with a disability: total expenditures, out-of-pocket expenses, and burden, 1996 to 2004.残疾生活的医疗保健支出:1996年至2004年的总支出、自付费用及负担
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1532-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.020.
3
National Health Care Expenditures Associated With Disability.国家医疗保健支出与残疾相关。
Med Care. 2020 Sep;58(9):826-832. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001371.
4
Estimates of state-level health-care expenditures associated with disability.州级医疗支出与残疾相关的估计。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb;125(1):44-51. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500107.
5
Medical expenditures for disability and disabling comorbidity.残疾及致残性合并症的医疗支出。
Am J Public Health. 1992 May;82(5):739-41. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.5.739.
6
The case of disability in the family: impact on health care utilization and expenditures for nondisabled members.家庭中的残疾情况:对非残疾家庭成员医疗保健利用和支出的影响。
Milbank Q. 1999;77(1):39-75, iv. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00124.
7
Physical Activity and Disability: An Analysis on How Activity Might Lower Medical Expenditures.身体活动与残疾:活动降低医疗支出的作用分析
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Aug 1;15(8):564-571. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0331. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
State-Level Health Care Expenditures Associated With Disability.与残疾相关的州级医疗保健支出。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Jul-Aug;136(4):441-450. doi: 10.1177/0033354920979807. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
Implications of alternative definitions of disability beyond health care expenditures.残疾的替代定义在医疗保健支出之外的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 1999 Aug;21(8):388-91. doi: 10.1080/096382899297521.
10
Prevalence of mobility and self-care disability--United States, 1990.1990年美国行动能力和自我照料残疾的患病率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993 Oct 8;42(39):760-1, 767-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an ICF-based eligibility procedure for education in Switzerland.瑞士基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的教育资格程序的制定。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 31;11 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S7.
2
The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities.为残疾人提供的卫生服务的组织与筹资。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):261-301. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00004.