Suppr超能文献

英国二噁英向陆地和水体排放情况综述。

A review of dioxin releases to land and water in the UK.

作者信息

Dyke P H, Foan C, Wenborn M, Coleman P J

机构信息

National Centre for Risk Analysis and Options Appraisal, Environment Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 1997 Nov 27;207(2-3):119-31. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(97)00254-4.

Abstract

UK government policy is to identify and control the sources of some chlorinated organic compounds including polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), often known collectively as dioxins. This requires the gathering of information on the scale of releases of PCDD/PCDFs to all environmental media. While a number of recent studies have produced inventories of PCDD/PCDF emissions to air, this study, commissioned by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Pollution (HMIP--now part of the Environment Agency), is the first attempt at producing a comprehensive UK inventory of emissions of dioxins to land and water from industrial and non-industrial processes. Release of PCDD/PCDFs in wastes taken to landfill are included under the definitions or releases to land used by the Environment Agency. Assembly of the inventory, particularly for releases to water, was severely hampered by lack of data from the UK or overseas; further work is required to remedy the data gaps and deficiencies revealed. The inventory puts total quantified releases to land at 1500-12,000 g toxic equivalent quantities (TEQ) per year--significantly more than releases to air or water. This is as expected, given the nature of the processes that form PCDD/PCDFs and their propensity to bind tightly to solid materials. The bulk of releases to land are to landfills rather than the open environment. From the data available, the open use of chemicals (including the disposal of wood treated with PCP), the manufacture of pesticides, the incineration of municipal solid waste (MSW) and accidental fires appear to be the largest contributors. The processes with greatest potential for releases to water appear to be the open use of chemicals, sewage treatment, disposal of waste oil, accidental fires, production of pesticides and chlorophenols and chemical waste incineration. In addition, the run-off from roads may be a significant source of releases as this is untreated. For the majority of processes studied, the trend is towards reduced releases to land and water, but improvements in the control of releases to air may lead to increased quantities of PCDD/PCDFs in some wastes and thus to increased releases to land. One exception may be from increasing quantities of sewage sludge disposed of to farm land. Changes in waste disposal practice--for example, use of wastes for soil improvement--may also inadvertently increase the probability of human exposure to PCDD/PCDF releases to land. The study did not attempt to assess the risks to humans and ecosystems from releases of PCDD/PCDFs to land and water: it recommends the development of an appropriate risk-assessment methodology.

摘要

英国政府的政策是识别并控制某些氯代有机化合物的来源,这些化合物包括多氯代二苯并 - 对 - 二恶英(PCDDs)和多氯代二苯并呋喃(PCDFs),通常统称为二恶英。这需要收集关于PCDDs/PCDFs向所有环境介质释放规模的信息。虽然最近的一些研究已经编制了PCDDs/PCDFs向空气排放的清单,但这项由英国污染监察局(HMIP,现为环境署的一部分)委托进行的研究,是首次尝试编制一份全面的英国工业和非工业过程中二恶英向陆地和水体排放的清单。运往垃圾填埋场的废物中PCDDs/PCDFs的释放包含在环境署所定义的向陆地的释放范围内。清单的编制,尤其是关于向水体的释放情况,因缺乏来自英国或海外的数据而受到严重阻碍;需要进一步开展工作来弥补所发现的数据空白和缺陷。该清单显示,向陆地的总定量释放量为每年1500 - 12000克毒性当量(TEQ),明显高于向空气或水体的释放量。考虑到形成PCDDs/PCDFs的过程的性质以及它们与固体材料紧密结合的倾向,这是意料之中的。向陆地的释放大部分是进入垃圾填埋场而非露天环境。根据现有数据,化学品的露天使用(包括处理过五氯苯酚的木材的处置)、农药制造、城市固体废物(MSW)焚烧和意外火灾似乎是最大的排放源。向水体释放潜力最大的过程似乎是化学品的露天使用、污水处理、废油处置、意外火灾、农药和氯酚生产以及化学废物焚烧。此外,道路径流可能是一个重要的排放源,因为其未经处理。对于所研究的大多数过程,趋势是向陆地和水体的释放量减少,但对向空气释放的控制的改善可能导致某些废物中PCDDs/PCDFs的量增加,从而导致向陆地的释放量增加。一个例外可能是用于农田的污水污泥量增加。废物处置方式的改变,例如将废物用于土壤改良,也可能无意中增加人类接触向陆地释放的PCDDs/PCDFs的可能性。该研究未尝试评估PCDDs/PCDFs向陆地和水体释放对人类和生态系统的风险:它建议开发一种适当的风险评估方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验