帕罗西汀与去甲替林治疗缺血性心脏病伴抑郁症患者的比较。
Comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease.
作者信息
Roose S P, Laghrissi-Thode F, Kennedy J S, Nelson J C, Bigger J T, Pollock B G, Gaffney A, Narayan M, Finkel M S, McCafferty J, Gergel I
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
出版信息
JAMA. 1998 Jan 28;279(4):287-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.4.287.
CONTEXT
Depression and ischemic heart disease often are comorbid conditions and, in patients who have had a myocardial infarction, the presence of depression is associated with increased mortality. Patients with heart disease need a safe and effective treatment for depression.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy, cardiovascular effects, and safety of a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, with a tricyclic antidepressant, nortriptyline hydrochloride, in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease.
DESIGN
Two-week placebo lead-in followed by a double-blind randomized 6-week medication trial.
SETTING
Research clinics in 4 university centers.
PATIENTS
Eighty-one outpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder and with documented ischemic heart disease.
INTERVENTIONS
Treatment with either paroxetine, 20 to 30 mg/d, or nortriptyline targeted to a therapeutic plasma level, 190 to 570 nmol/L (50-150 ng/mL), for 6 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
For effectiveness of treatment, a decline in the score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by 50% and final score of 8 or less; for cardiovascular safety, heart rate and rhythm, supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures, electrocardiogram conduction intervals, indexes of heart rate variability, and rate of adverse events.
RESULTS
By intent-to-treat analysis, 25 (61%) of 41 patients improved during treatment with paroxetine and 22 (55%) of 40 improved with nortriptyline. Neither drug significantly affected blood pressure or conduction intervals. Paroxetine had no sustained effects on heart rate or rhythm or indexes of heart rate variability, whereas patients treated with nortriptyline had a sustained 11% increase in heart rate from a mean of 75 to 83 beats per minute (P<.001) and a reduction in heart rate variability, as measured by the SD of all normal R-R intervals over a 24-hour period, from 112 to 96 (P<.01). Adverse cardiac events occurred in 1 (2%) of 41 patients treated with paroxetine and 7 (18%) of 40 patients treated with nortriptyline (P<.03).
CONCLUSIONS
Paroxetine and nortriptyline are effective treatments for depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. Nortriptyline treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of serious adverse cardiac events compared with paroxetine.
背景
抑郁症和缺血性心脏病常常并存,在心肌梗死患者中,抑郁症的存在与死亡率增加相关。心脏病患者需要一种安全有效的抑郁症治疗方法。
目的
比较选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂帕罗西汀与三环类抗抑郁药盐酸去甲替林在缺血性心脏病伴抑郁症患者中的疗效、心血管效应及安全性。
设计
为期2周的安慰剂导入期,随后进行为期6周的双盲随机药物试验。
地点
4所大学中心的研究诊所。
患者
81名门诊患者,符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版中重度抑郁症的标准且有缺血性心脏病记录。
干预措施
分别用帕罗西汀20至30mg/d或目标治疗血浆水平为190至570nmol/L(50 - 150ng/mL)的盐酸去甲替林治疗6周。
主要观察指标
治疗效果方面,汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分下降50%且最终评分≤8分;心血管安全性方面,心率和心律、仰卧位和站立位收缩压及舒张压、心电图传导间期、心率变异性指标及不良事件发生率。
结果
意向性分析显示,41例接受帕罗西汀治疗的患者中有25例(61%)治疗期间病情改善,40例接受去甲替林治疗的患者中有22例(55%)病情改善。两种药物均未显著影响血压或传导间期。帕罗西汀对心率、心律或心率变异性指标无持续影响,而去甲替林治疗的患者心率从平均每分钟75次持续增加11%至83次(P<0.001),且心率变异性降低,通过24小时内所有正常R - R间期标准差衡量,从112降至96(P<0.01)。接受帕罗西汀治疗的41例患者中有1例(2%)发生不良心脏事件,接受去甲替林治疗的40例患者中有7例(18%)发生不良心脏事件(P<0.03)。
结论
帕罗西汀和去甲替林对缺血性心脏病伴抑郁症患者均为有效治疗药物。与帕罗西汀相比,去甲替林治疗相关的严重不良心脏事件发生率显著更高。