Jefferson M F, Pendleton N, Mohamed S, Kirkman E, Little R A, Lucas S B, Horan M A
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Jan;84(1):357-61. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.1.357.
There is no established method for accurately predicting how much blood loss has occurred during hemorrhage. In the present study, we examine whether a genetic algorithm neural network (GANN) can predict volume of hemorrhage in an experimental model in rats and we compare its accuracy to stepwise linear regression (SLR). Serial measurements of heart period; diastolic, systolic, and mean blood pressures; hemoglobin; pH; arterial PO2; arterial PCO2; bicarbonate; base deficit; and blood loss as percent of total estimated blood volume were made in 33 male Wistar rats during a stepwise hemorrhage. The GANN and SLR used a randomly assigned training set to predict actual volume of hemorrhage in a test set. Diastolic blood pressure, arterial PO2, and base deficit were selected by the GANN as the optimal predictors set. Root mean square error in prediction of estimated blood volume by GANN was significantly lower than by SLR (2.63%, SD 1.44, and 4.22%, SD 3.48, respectively; P < 0.001). A GANN can predict highly accurately and significantly better than SLR volume of hemorrhage without knowledge of prehemorrhage status, rate of blood loss, or trend in physiological variables.
目前尚无准确预测出血期间失血量的既定方法。在本研究中,我们检验了遗传算法神经网络(GANN)能否在大鼠实验模型中预测出血量,并将其准确性与逐步线性回归(SLR)进行比较。在33只雄性Wistar大鼠逐步出血过程中,连续测量了心动周期、舒张压、收缩压和平均血压、血红蛋白、pH值、动脉血氧分压、动脉血二氧化碳分压、碳酸氢盐、碱缺失以及失血量占估计总血容量的百分比。GANN和SLR使用随机分配的训练集来预测测试集中的实际出血量。GANN选择舒张压、动脉血氧分压和碱缺失作为最佳预测指标集。GANN预测估计血容量的均方根误差显著低于SLR(分别为2.63%,标准差1.44,和4.22%,标准差3.48;P<0.001)。在不了解出血前状态、失血速率或生理变量趋势的情况下,GANN能够高度准确地预测出血量,且显著优于SLR。