Wenk H, Shekarriz H, Bruch H P
Klinik für Chirurgie, Zentralkrankenhaus Bremen Nord.
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(9):743-6.
A prospective, randomized trial was performed to compare 40 patients with aortic aneurysms which were treated by implantation of dacron or PTFE prostheses. Follow up was done according to a defined protocol for 3 to 34 months postoperatively. There was observed neither graft failure, vascular occlusion, perigraft-reaction nor infection in any case. In one patient a periprosthetic haematoma occurred. During postoperative follow up in each group one patient died. There were no significant differences in dilation of the material in both groups. Dacron prostheses dilated to 28.2%, PTFE to 30.5%. In both groups the graft limb dilated more in comparison to the tube.
进行了一项前瞻性随机试验，比较40例接受涤纶或聚四氟乙烯人工血管植入治疗的主动脉瘤患者。术后按照既定方案进行了3至34个月的随访。在任何情况下均未观察到人工血管失败、血管闭塞、人工血管周围反应或感染。有1例患者发生了人工血管周围血肿。每组在术后随访期间均有1例患者死亡。两组材料的扩张情况无显著差异。涤纶人工血管扩张了28.2%，聚四氟乙烯人工血管扩张了30.5%。与人工血管管体相比，两组人工血管分支的扩张程度更大。
