Gray G C, McPhate D C, Leinonen M, Cassell G H, Deperalta E P, Putnam S D, Karcher J A, Sawyer M H, Laurila A, Connor J D
Clinical Epidemiology Division, Naval Health Research Center, Navy Environmental and Preventive Medicine Unit No. 5, San Diego, California 92186-5122, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;26(1):103-10. doi: 10.1086/516275.
Since the 1950s the U.S. military has used intramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) to control outbreaks of respiratory disease. In an effort to find an alternative prophylaxis, a randomized field trial was conducted among 1,016 male U.S. Marine trainee volunteers at high risk for respiratory disease. Participants were evaluated for evidence of acute respiratory infection by serological tests on pretraining and posttraining sera (63 days apart). Oral azithromycin prophylaxis (500 mg/w) outperformed BPG, preventing infection from Streptococcus pyogenes (Efficacy [E] = 84%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 63%-93%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (E = 80%; 95% CI, 50%-92%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (E = 64%; 95% CI, 25%-83%), and Chlamydia pneumoniae (E = 58%; 95% CI, 15%-79%) in comparison with results in a no-treatment group. Azithromycin group subjects reported few side effects and less respiratory symptoms than the BPG and no-treatment groups. According to serological tests, oral azithromycin is an effective alternative prophylaxis to BPG for military populations.
自20世纪50年代以来,美国军方一直使用苄星青霉素G(BPG)肌肉注射来控制呼吸道疾病的爆发。为了寻找替代预防措施,在1016名有呼吸道疾病高风险的美国海军陆战队男性新兵志愿者中进行了一项随机现场试验。通过对训练前和训练后血清(间隔63天)进行血清学检测,评估参与者是否有急性呼吸道感染的证据。口服阿奇霉素预防(500毫克/周)比BPG更有效,与未治疗组相比,可预防化脓性链球菌感染(疗效[E]=84%;95%置信区间[CI],63%-93%)、肺炎链球菌感染(E=80%;95%CI,50%-92%)、肺炎支原体感染(E=64%;95%CI,25%-83%)和肺炎衣原体感染(E=58%;95%CI,15%-79%)。与BPG组和未治疗组相比,阿奇霉素组受试者报告的副作用较少,呼吸道症状也较少。根据血清学检测,口服阿奇霉素是军队人群预防BPG的有效替代药物。