Katz M G, Katz R, Schachner A, Cohen A J
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jan;65(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00915-6.
Phrenic nerve injury after coronary artery bypass grafting resolves in most cases. The purpose of this study was to analyze the causes and effects of persistent phrenic nerve injury after coronary artery bypass grafting.
From a registry of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, 64 patients were identified who experienced phrenic nerve injury during their operation. Fifteen patients either died during follow-up (n = 9) or were lost to follow-up (n = 6). At the last follow-up visit, all the patients underwent an ultrasound evaluation of the diaphragm and were divided into those who had persistent dysfunction (group I) and those who had normal function (group II). The groups were compared for preoperative and operative risk factors, acute and midterm postoperative results, and quality of life at last follow-up.
There were 13 patients in group I and 36 in group II. There were no significant differences in preoperative and operative risk factors between the groups. The length of hospitalization was similar for both groups (9.2 +/- 4.5 versus 8.5 +/- 3.3 days, respectively; p = 0.77). More patients in group I required reintubation (23% versus 14%, respectively; p = 0.04). The mean duration of follow-up was 32.7 +/- 9.2 months. At that time, both groups suffered a reduction of forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with preoperative values. Group I had a greater reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (p = 0.05). There were a total of 125 postoperative readmissions during the follow-up period, 36 in group I and 89 in group II. There were more admissions because of pulmonary problems in group I (85% versus 53%; p = 0.04). Of the 49 patients, 21 perceived a decline in quality of life after operation. More patients in group I (46% versus 22%; p = 0.05) complained of this decrease.
A significant number of patients who incur phrenic nerve injury after coronary artery bypass grafting have persistent phrenic nerve injury. Patients with persistent phrenic nerve injury have increased acute and midterm morbidity after operation, as well as reduced quality of life.
冠状动脉旁路移植术后膈神经损伤在大多数情况下会自行恢复。本研究的目的是分析冠状动脉旁路移植术后持续性膈神经损伤的原因及影响。
从接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者登记册中,确定64例在手术期间发生膈神经损伤的患者。15例患者在随访期间死亡(n = 9)或失访(n = 6)。在最后一次随访时,所有患者均接受了膈肌超声评估,并分为持续性功能障碍患者(I组)和功能正常患者(II组)。比较两组患者的术前和手术风险因素、术后急性和中期结果以及最后随访时的生活质量。
I组有13例患者,II组有36例患者。两组患者的术前和手术风险因素无显著差异。两组患者的住院时间相似(分别为9.2±4.5天和8.5±3.3天;p = 0.77)。I组需要再次插管的患者更多(分别为23%和14%;p = 0.04)。平均随访时间为32.7±9.2个月。此时,与术前值相比,两组患者的第1秒用力呼气量均有所下降。I组第1秒用力呼气量下降幅度更大(p = 0.05)。随访期间共有125例术后再次入院,I组36例,II组89例。I组因肺部问题入院的患者更多(85%对53%;p = 0.04)。在49例患者中,21例感觉术后生活质量下降。I组抱怨生活质量下降的患者更多(46%对22%;p = 0.05)。
大量冠状动脉旁路移植术后发生膈神经损伤的患者存在持续性膈神经损伤。持续性膈神经损伤的患者术后急性和中期发病率增加,生活质量降低。