• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际化学品安全规划署神经行为筛查方法协作研究:五、化学检测结果。指导小组

The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: V. Results of chemical testing. Steering Group.

作者信息

Moser V C, Becking G C, Cuomo V, Frantík E, Kulig B M, MacPhail R C, Tilson H A, Winneke G, Brightwell W S, De Salvia M A, Gill M W, Haggerty G C, Hornychová M, Lammers J, Larsen J J, McDaniel K L, Nelson B K, Ostergaard G

机构信息

Neurotoxicology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 USA.

出版信息

Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):969-1055.

PMID:9457733
Abstract

The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods was undertaken to determine the intra- and inter-laboratory reliability of a functional observational battery (FOB) and an automated assessment of motor activity in eight laboratories world-wide. Following the training phase and the conduct of proficiency studies in all laboratories, participants proceeded to test the effects of seven chemicals in both single dose and four-week repeated dosing scenarios. The chemicals studied were acrylamide, bisacrylamide, p,p'-DDT, lead acetate, parathion, toluene, and triethyl tin. Participants received coded samples from a common source. In order to judge the general utility of these procedures in a diversity of testing situations, laboratories conducted the studies under their standard conditions, using their choice of rat strain and test equipment. Chemical does and time of peak effect for acute testing were determined by each laboratory: these parameters were quite similar for some chemicals, but varied greatly for others. The results of the chemical tests indicated that while there was some variability in the data on specific endpoints, all laboratories detected and characterized the effects of all but one of the known neurotoxicants. The one exception (toluene) was probably due to other factors (e.g., dose level, route of administration) rather than lack of sensitivity of the test methods. This study provides extensive data regarding the use of neurobehavioral screening methods over a range of laboratory conditions as well as the reliability, sensitivity, and robustness of the tests to detect neurotoxic potential of chemicals.

摘要

国际化学品安全规划署(IPCS)开展了神经行为筛查方法合作研究,以确定全球八个实验室中功能观察组合测试(FOB)和运动活动自动评估的实验室内和实验室间可靠性。在所有实验室完成培训阶段和能力验证研究后,参与者着手测试七种化学品在单剂量和四周重复给药情况下的效果。所研究的化学品有丙烯酰胺、双丙烯酰胺、p,p'-滴滴涕、醋酸铅、对硫磷、甲苯和三乙基锡。参与者收到来自同一来源的编码样本。为了判断这些程序在各种测试情况下的普遍适用性,各实验室在其标准条件下进行研究,使用各自选择的大鼠品系和测试设备。各实验室自行确定急性测试的化学剂量和峰值效应时间:这些参数对某些化学品非常相似,但对其他化学品则差异很大。化学测试结果表明,虽然特定终点数据存在一定变异性,但所有实验室都检测并描述了除一种已知神经毒物外的所有毒物的影响。唯一的例外(甲苯)可能是由于其他因素(如剂量水平、给药途径),而非测试方法缺乏敏感性。本研究提供了关于在一系列实验室条件下使用神经行为筛查方法的数据,以及这些测试检测化学品神经毒性潜力的可靠性、敏感性和稳健性。

相似文献

1
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: V. Results of chemical testing. Steering Group.国际化学品安全规划署神经行为筛查方法协作研究:五、化学检测结果。指导小组
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):969-1055.
2
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: II. Protocol design and testing procedures.
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):929-38.
3
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: VI. Agreement and reliability of the data.国际化学品安全规划署神经行为筛查方法合作研究:六、数据的一致性和可靠性
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):1057-64.
4
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: III. Results of proficiency studies. Steering Group.国际化学品安全规划署神经行为筛查方法协作研究:III. 能力验证研究结果。指导小组。
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):939-46.
5
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: VII. Summary and conclusions.国际化学品安全规划署神经行为筛查方法协作研究:VII. 总结与结论
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):1065-9.
6
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening. I. Background and genesis.
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):925-8.
7
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: IV. Control data. Steering Group.国际化学品安全规划署神经行为筛查方法合作研究:IV. 对照数据。指导小组。
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(4):947-67.
8
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
9
International validation of a neurobehavioral screening battery: the IPCS/WHO collaborative study.一套神经行为筛查量表的国际验证:国际化学品安全方案/世界卫生组织合作研究
Toxicol Lett. 1992 Dec;64-65 Spec No:217-23. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(92)90192-m.
10
Comparative sensitivity of neurobehavioral tests for chemical screening.用于化学物质筛查的神经行为测试的比较敏感性。
Neurotoxicology. 1990 Summer;11(2):335-44.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426.一项支持经合组织测试指南426的发育神经毒性研究的回顾性性能评估。
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jan;117(1):17-25. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11447. Epub 2008 Aug 12.