Kumar M S, Panigrahi D, Dezii C M, Abouna G M, Chvala R, Brezin J, Kumar A M, Katz S M, McSorley M, Laskow D A
Department of Surgery, Allegheny University, Hahnemann Division, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-1192, USA.
Transplantation. 1998 Jan 27;65(2):282-5. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199801270-00027.
Traditionally, elderly donor kidneys have not been widely accepted for transplantation on the assumption of inferior performance. However, the United Network for Organ Sharing reports an increase in the number of elderly donors from less than 2% in 1982 to 24% in 1995. This trend is commensurate with the increase of older dialysis patients and an overall increase in the elderly population in the United States (1). Optimal utilization of these kidneys is essential to overcome the acute organ shortage.
In this study, we transplanted 25 kidneys from elderly donors (ages 56-72 years) into young adult recipients (ages 20-50 years) (group 1) over a 4-year period. We compared the results with matched recipients of young adult donor kidneys (group 2) with regard to long-term kidney function and graft survival. A pretransplant biopsy of elderly donor kidneys was carried out and a frozen section report was obtained. Only those kidneys showing glomerulosclerosis of less than 20% were accepted for transplantation. All cadaveric kidneys were preserved in University of Wisconsin solution.
Pretransplant biopsies of elderly donor kidneys showed structural deficits, which included glomerulosclerosis in 85%, arteriolar and/or mesangial thickening in 75%, and interstitial lymphocyte infiltration in 30%. The mean serum creatinine was 2.4+/-0.74, 2.2+/-0.56, and 2.9+/-0.76 mg/100 ml in group 1 and 1.5+/-0.55, 2.3+/-2.24, and 1.7+/-0.62 in group 2 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The patient survival was 92%, 92%, and 88% in group 1, and 100%, 100%, and 100% in group 2 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The graft survival was 80%, 64%, and 56% in group 1 and 100%, 96%, and 88% in group 2 at similar time intervals. The differences in the serum creatinine and graft survival between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Most of the elderly donor kidneys with structural deficits transplanted into young adults provided suboptimal function and inferior long-term graft survival. To maximize the utilization and optimize the survival of elderly donor kidneys, we propose transplantation of these kidneys into age-matched recipients with similar physiological requirements as those of donors, with regard to kidney function.
传统上,由于认为老年供肾的性能较差,其在移植中未被广泛接受。然而,器官共享联合网络报告称,老年供者的数量从1982年的不到2%增加到了1995年的24%。这一趋势与美国老年透析患者数量的增加以及老年人口总数的增加是相称的(1)。对这些肾脏进行最佳利用对于克服急性器官短缺至关重要。
在本研究中,我们在4年期间将25个来自老年供者(年龄56 - 72岁)的肾脏移植给了年轻成年受者(年龄20 - 50岁)(第1组)。我们将结果与匹配的年轻成年供肾受者(第2组)在长期肾功能和移植物存活方面进行了比较。对老年供肾进行了移植前活检并获得了冰冻切片报告。仅接受那些肾小球硬化小于20%的肾脏进行移植。所有尸体肾均保存在威斯康星大学溶液中。
老年供肾的移植前活检显示存在结构缺陷,其中85%有肾小球硬化,75%有小动脉和/或系膜增厚,30%有间质淋巴细胞浸润。第1组在1年、3年和5年时的平均血清肌酐分别为2.4±0.74、2.2±0.56和2.9±0.76mg/100ml,第2组在相应时间点分别为1.5±0.55、2.3±2.24和1.7±0.62mg/100ml。第1组在1年、3年和5年时的患者存活率分别为92%、92%和88%,第2组分别为100%、100%和100%。在相似时间间隔下,第1组的移植物存活率分别为80%、64%和56%,第2组分别为100%、96%和88%。两组之间血清肌酐和移植物存活情况的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
大多数移植到年轻成年人中的存在结构缺陷的老年供肾提供的功能欠佳且长期移植物存活情况较差。为了最大限度地利用老年供肾并优化其存活,我们建议将这些肾脏移植给与供者具有相似生理需求且年龄匹配的受者,在肾功能方面。