Meijer W G, van der Veer E, Willemse P H
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Oncol Rep. 1998 Jan-Feb;5(1):5-21.
The role of biochemical markers of bone metabolism in the diagnosis and monitoring of bone metastases in solid tumors is reviewed. Emphasis is on the recently developed markers, which may provide a more accurate quantitation of bone metabolism. In metastatic bone disease, bone formation and resorption become uncoupled processes, leading to predominantly osteoblastic or osteolytic metastases. In osteolytic metastases, bone resorption is enhanced without appropriate acceleration of bone formation. In osteolytic metastases the resorption markers are indicated for the detection of bone metastases. Urinary pyridinium cross-links and serum collagen telopeptides are sensitive and specific markers of bone resorption. These markers, can often identify bone metastases before visualization by imaging techniques. When osteolytic lesions are responding to treatment the physiologic coupling between bone resorption and formation is partly restored. An increase in formation markers, bone specific isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), osteocalcin (OC) and carboxyterminal propeptide of collagen type I (PICP), will then closely reflect restoration of coupling. In osteoblastic metastases, bone formation markers can accurately indicate early and advanced bone involvement. Bone resorption markers are less sensitive in these osteoblastic lesions. The collagen telopeptides however, are resorption markers with the ability to detect early bone metastases. Osteoblastic lesions responding to therapy are indicated by declining values of formation as well as resorption markers. The precise role of the recently developed markers of bone metabolism in early diagnosis and monitoring of bone metastases needs further evaluation in longitudinal studies. Since the delicate derangements in bone metabolism may be obscured in mixed patient groups, these studies should address uniform patient groups with respect to the primary tumor type.
综述了骨代谢生化标志物在实体瘤骨转移诊断和监测中的作用。重点关注最近开发的标志物,其可能提供更准确的骨代谢定量。在转移性骨病中,骨形成和骨吸收过程解偶联,导致主要为成骨性或溶骨性转移。在溶骨性转移中,骨吸收增强而骨形成未适当加速。在溶骨性转移中,骨吸收标志物可用于检测骨转移。尿吡啶交联物和血清胶原端肽是骨吸收的敏感和特异性标志物。这些标志物常常能在影像学技术显示骨转移之前就识别出来。当溶骨性病变对治疗有反应时,骨吸收和形成之间的生理偶联会部分恢复。此时,形成标志物,如碱性磷酸酶骨特异性同工酶(BSAP)、骨钙素(OC)和I型胶原羧基末端前肽(PICP)的增加将密切反映偶联的恢复。在成骨性转移中,骨形成标志物可准确指示早期和晚期骨受累情况。在这些成骨性病变中,骨吸收标志物不太敏感。然而,胶原端肽是能够检测早期骨转移的骨吸收标志物。对治疗有反应的成骨性病变表现为形成标志物和骨吸收标志物的值下降。最近开发的骨代谢标志物在骨转移早期诊断和监测中的精确作用需要在纵向研究中进一步评估。由于在混合患者群体中骨代谢的细微紊乱可能被掩盖,这些研究应针对原发性肿瘤类型一致的患者群体。