Gollhofer A, Schöpp A, Rapp W, Stroinik V
Department of Sport Science, University of Stuttgart, Germany.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77(1-2):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s004210050305.
Enhancement of muscle stretch following isometric contraction has been thought to occur as a result of inhibitory reflex mechanisms. Experiments with electrical stimulation (H-reflex) have demonstrated maximal H-reflex suppression during force relaxation followed by gradual recovery over the following 20 s. There has been considerable speculation as to whether electrical and mechanical stimulation elicit similar response behaviour. The present study examined postisometric reflex modulation following both stimulation modalities. In ten subjects dorsiflexion stimuli varying in speed and amplitude were applied after 30% and 60% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Modulation of the mechanically and electrically evoked responses following isometric plantarflexion was investigated. Reflex responses following both stimulation modalities were depressed during the course of force relaxation. A rather fast recovery was observed in mechanical stimulation. Postisometric response modulation was neither altered by the amount of isometric plantarflexion, nor by the amplitude of the applied stretch stimulus. With increasing velocity of the applied dorsiflexion, however, the shape of the reflex modulation persisted, but the magnitude of the responses was significantly enhanced. In electrical stimulation, however, recovery was delayed. It is suggested that postisometric reflex modulation is due to presynaptic inhibition. Moreover, possible peripheral mechanisms resulting from alpha-gamma-coactivation may also affect the stretch receptor itself because of inherent stiffness properties. The latter possibility particularly would explain the differences between mechanical and electrical stimulus modalities. With respect to practical implications, the very fast recovery (< 400 ms) of the stretch responses to control values strongly contradicts the interpretation that after isometric precontraction, suppression of reflex activity might be used for more efficient stretching of the tendomuscle system.
等长收缩后肌肉伸展的增强被认为是抑制性反射机制作用的结果。电刺激(H反射)实验表明,在力量放松期间H反射受到最大程度的抑制,随后在接下来的20秒内逐渐恢复。关于电刺激和机械刺激是否引发相似的反应行为,一直存在大量猜测。本研究考察了两种刺激方式后的等长收缩后反射调制情况。在10名受试者中,在30%和60%最大自主收缩(MVC)后施加了速度和幅度不同的背屈刺激。对等长跖屈后机械诱发和电诱发反应的调制进行了研究。在力量放松过程中,两种刺激方式后的反射反应均受到抑制。在机械刺激中观察到恢复相当快。等长收缩后反应调制既不受等长跖屈量的影响,也不受所施加伸展刺激幅度的影响。然而,随着所施加背屈速度的增加,反射调制的形态持续存在,但反应幅度显著增强。然而,在电刺激中,恢复延迟。提示等长收缩后反射调制是由于突触前抑制。此外,由于α-γ共同激活导致的可能的外周机制也可能因其固有僵硬度特性而影响牵张感受器本身。后一种可能性尤其可以解释机械刺激和电刺激方式之间的差异。就实际意义而言,牵张反应非常快速地恢复到对照值(<400毫秒),这与等长预收缩后反射活动的抑制可能用于更有效地拉伸肌腱肌肉系统这一解释强烈矛盾。