Suppr超能文献

电子牙科麻醉与局部麻醉用于控制鼻腭神经阻滞注射引起的疼痛的比较。

Electronic dental anesthesia versus topical anesthesia for the control of pain caused by nasopalatine block injections.

作者信息

Ravela E D, de Guzman E F, Masa A V, Locsin J C, Ahn K S, Uy H G

出版信息

J Philipp Dent Assoc. 1995 Sep-Nov;47(2):35-43.

PMID:9462076
Abstract

Topical anesthetics are routinely used to reduce the pain and discomfort that patients may experience during dental injections. Just recently, however, an anesthesia (Electronic Dental Anesthesia or EDA) which works by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was introduced to the dental profession. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an electrical signal as provided by an EDA is more effective than topical anesthesia in reducing pain and discomfort caused by local anesthetic injections. Two nasopalatine block injections, one using and EDA as the adjunct, and the other using a topical anesthetic ointment of Xylocaine 5% were performed on thirty-four patients. The volunteers were asked on the spot to report the level of the pain they felt during the penetration of the needle to the mucosa, during the deposition of local anesthetic solution, and their overall evaluation of the injections. The results of this investigation showed that the EDA is the more effective adjunct for local anesthetic injections compared to the traditional topical anesthetics.

摘要

局部麻醉剂通常用于减轻患者在牙科注射过程中可能经历的疼痛和不适。然而,就在最近,一种通过经皮电神经刺激(TENS)起作用的麻醉方法(电子牙科麻醉或EDA)被引入牙科行业。本研究的目的是确定EDA提供的电信号在减轻局部麻醉注射引起的疼痛和不适方面是否比局部麻醉更有效。对34名患者进行了两次鼻腭神经阻滞注射,一次使用EDA作为辅助,另一次使用5%利多卡因局部麻醉软膏。志愿者被要求当场报告他们在针头刺入黏膜、注射局部麻醉溶液过程中所感受到的疼痛程度,以及对注射的总体评价。这项调查的结果表明,与传统的局部麻醉剂相比,EDA是局部麻醉注射更有效的辅助手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验