Suppr超能文献

电子牙科麻醉在儿童修复治疗中的有效性。

Effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia for restorative care in children.

作者信息

Cho S Y, Drummond B K, Anderson M H, Williams S

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 1998 Mar-Apr;20(2):105-11.

PMID:9566014
Abstract

The effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia (EDA) for pain control during restorative procedures was compared with local anesthetic injection (LA) in 32 children aged 6 to 12 years. Each child selected had two antimere primary or permanent molars requiring similar-sized Class I or Class II restorations. The pain levels during restorative treatment were assessed using a visual analogue scale. Heart rates and behavior were also recorded. A crossover design was used with each child acting as his/her own control. The results showed that overall, EDA was less effective than LA for cavity preparation. The reported pain scores for EDA were higher in permanent teeth for the deeper cavities, and with one of the operators. The pre- or post-treatment anxiety scores were not found to differ significantly between the two restorative appointments. However, children with the highest pretreatment scores were more likely to report higher pain scores with EDA. Despite this, 63% of the children preferred EDA to LA. Dental anxiety, cavity depth, the tooth being treated, and operator attitude may also be important factors in determining the success of EDA.

摘要

在32名6至12岁的儿童中,对电子牙科麻醉(EDA)在修复治疗过程中控制疼痛的效果与局部麻醉注射(LA)进行了比较。每个入选的儿童都有两颗需要进行大小相似的I类或II类修复的对侧乳磨牙或恒牙。使用视觉模拟量表评估修复治疗期间的疼痛程度。还记录了心率和行为。采用交叉设计,每个儿童作为自己的对照。结果表明,总体而言,在制备窝洞方面,EDA不如LA有效。对于较深的龋洞,在恒牙中以及由其中一名操作人员操作时,EDA报告的疼痛评分更高。在两次修复预约之间,治疗前或治疗后的焦虑评分没有显著差异。然而,治疗前评分最高的儿童使用EDA时更有可能报告更高的疼痛评分。尽管如此,63%的儿童更喜欢EDA而不是LA。牙科焦虑、龋洞深度、治疗的牙齿以及操作人员的态度也可能是决定EDA成功与否的重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验