Zhang Z Q, Ishaque M
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1997 Dec;65(4):469-76.
Mycobacteria generally have thick cell walls and contain large amounts of lipid, making them resistant to DNA extraction. Five methods, namely, extensive enzymic digestion method (M1), 2-min mechanical glass-bead disruption method (M2), thermal shock method (M3), modified conventional enzymic digestion method (M4), and manual disruption with modified conventional enzymic digestion method (M5), were used to compare their effectiveness and simplicity in extracting DNA from slowly growing mycobacteria (Mycobacterium leprae, M. lepraemurium and M. bovis BCG), and a rapidly growing mycobacterium (M. phlei). The highest DNA yield was obtained by M2 from M. lepraemurium which produced 2.82 micrograms DNA/mg wet weight of cells, representing a theoretical yield of 78%. M3 gave the lowest DNA yield; 0.01 microgram DNA/mg wet weight of cells of M. lepraemurium was obtained. M4, in which proteinase K was used, is more effective than M1, in which subtilisin and pronase were used. M5 yielded a higher amount of DNA, but it required more manipulations to extract DNA as compared to M4. Extraction of DNA of M. leprae from nude mice is more difficult than that of M. leprae from armadillos by all of the methods used. These results suggest that the biosynthetic capabilities of these two forms of M. leprae may vary, depending on their cultural conditions and/or strain differences. Our results have shown that both M2 and M4 are the simplest, most effective and time-saving methods which are suitable for every routine laboratory to extract DNA from slowly and rapidly growing mycobacteria.
分枝杆菌通常具有厚厚的细胞壁,并且含有大量脂质,这使得它们难以进行DNA提取。我们采用了五种方法,即广泛酶消化法(M1)、2分钟机械玻璃珠破碎法(M2)、热休克法(M3)、改良常规酶消化法(M4)和改良常规酶消化法手动破碎法(M5),来比较它们从生长缓慢的分枝杆菌(麻风分枝杆菌、鼠麻风分枝杆菌和卡介苗)以及快速生长的分枝杆菌(草分枝杆菌)中提取DNA的有效性和简便性。从鼠麻风分枝杆菌中提取DNA,M2的产量最高,每毫克湿重细胞产生2.82微克DNA,理论产量为78%。M3的DNA产量最低,从鼠麻风分枝杆菌每毫克湿重细胞中仅获得0.01微克DNA。使用蛋白酶K的M4比使用枯草杆菌蛋白酶和链霉蛋白酶的M1更有效。M5产生的DNA量更高,但与M4相比,提取DNA需要更多操作。使用所有方法从裸鼠中提取麻风分枝杆菌的DNA都比从犰狳中提取更困难。这些结果表明,这两种形式的麻风分枝杆菌的生物合成能力可能因培养条件和/或菌株差异而有所不同。我们的结果表明,M2和M4都是最简单、最有效且最省时的方法,适用于每个常规实验室从生长缓慢和快速生长的分枝杆菌中提取DNA。