• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用造影剂的全身磁共振血管造影。技术优化]

[Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography using a contrast medium. Technical optimization].

作者信息

Carriero A, Scarabino T, Magarelli N, Giannatempo G, Vizzani F, Cammisa M, Salvolini U, Bonomo L

机构信息

Istituto di Scienze Radiologiche e Formazione dell'Immagine, Università G. D'Annunzio, Chieti.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 1997 Oct;94(4):319-24.

PMID:9465237
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We tried to optimize the technique of contrast enhanced MR Angiography (MRA) in the study of the main body arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty volunteers were examined with contrast enhanced MRA with a superconductive magnet at 1.5 T (Signa GE) and 3D SPGR sequences acquired with the following parameters: TR 8.2 +/- 1.3 ms, TE 1.8 +/- 7 ms, FA 60 degrees, MA 128 X 256; the images were acquired on the sagittal or coronal planes. The contrast agent (Gd-DTPA) was injected with MedRad Spectris system, with the bolus technique and the following standard parameters: velocity 1.5 mL/s and single dose; circulation time was optimized with 2D SPGR for each vessel (pretest). The carotid and pulmonary arteries, the thoracic-abdominal aorta and the iliac arteries were studied. The reader used a multiple choice card to evaluate image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and circulation time.

RESULTS

Circulation time was 10.2 s in the carotid arteries, 8.1 s in the pulmonary arteries, 10.3 s in the thoracic aorta, 12.2 s in the abdominal aorta and 13.8 s in the iliac arteries. The signal was 181.8 vs the noise 3.1 in the carotid arteries, 256.8 vs 23.2 in the thoracic aorta, 518.4 vs 23.5 in the pulmonary arteries, 258.8 vs 24.5 in the abdominal aorta and finally 262.7 vs 25.4 in the iliac arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience suggests that contrast enhanced MRA is a good technique to study body arteries.

摘要

引言

我们试图在主体动脉研究中优化对比增强磁共振血管造影(MRA)技术。

材料与方法

50名志愿者接受了1.5T超导磁体(GE Signa)的对比增强MRA检查,并采用以下参数获取3D SPGR序列:TR 8.2±1.3毫秒,TE 1.8±7毫秒,翻转角60度,矩阵128×256;图像在矢状面或冠状面采集。造影剂(钆喷酸葡胺)通过MedRad Spectris系统注射,采用团注技术和以下标准参数:流速1.5毫升/秒,单剂量;通过二维SPGR对每个血管进行循环时间优化(预试验)。对颈动脉、肺动脉、胸主动脉、腹主动脉和髂动脉进行了研究。阅片者使用多选卡评估图像质量、信噪比(SNR)和循环时间。

结果

颈动脉循环时间为10.2秒,肺动脉为8.1秒,胸主动脉为10.3秒,腹主动脉为12.2秒,髂动脉为13.8秒。颈动脉信号为181.8,噪声为3.1;胸主动脉信号为256.8,噪声为23.2;肺动脉信号为518.4,噪声为23.5;腹主动脉信号为258.8,噪声为24.5;髂动脉信号为262.7,噪声为25.4。

结论

我们的经验表明,对比增强MRA是研究人体动脉的一种良好技术。

相似文献

1
[Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography using a contrast medium. Technical optimization].[使用造影剂的全身磁共振血管造影。技术优化]
Radiol Med. 1997 Oct;94(4):319-24.
2
[Angiography with magnetic resonance of the body with contrast media. Experience with a 0.5 tesla device].
Radiol Med. 1998 May;95(5):466-9.
3
[Magnetic resonance angiography of the vessels of the neck: the optimization of a dynamic technic during the rapid infusion of a paramagnetic contrast medium].[颈部血管的磁共振血管造影:在快速注入顺磁性造影剂过程中动态技术的优化]
Radiol Med. 1997 Oct;94(4):325-8.
4
Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional pulmonary MR-angiography: 1.0 M gadobutrol vs. 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine.时间分辨对比增强三维肺部磁共振血管造影:1.0M钆布醇与0.5M钆喷酸葡胺的对比
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Feb;19(2):202-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10452.
5
Dose comparison of single- vs. double-dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: Intraindividual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA.颈动脉对比增强磁共振血管造影单剂量与双剂量的剂量比较:使用钆喷酸葡胺的个体内交叉盲法试验
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Mar;25(3):557-63. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20855.
6
Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence.磁共振冠状动脉血管造影:钆贝葡胺和钆喷酸葡胺增强的扰相梯度回波序列与非对比增强稳态自由进动序列之间的比较
Acta Radiol. 2009 May;50(4):406-11. doi: 10.1080/02841850902838066.
7
Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.使用大视野非选择性射频激发的全胸部非增强三维稳态自由进动磁共振血管造影:与单相三维对比增强磁共振血管造影的比较
Invest Radiol. 2008 Jun;43(6):411-20. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181690179.
8
[Renal arteries: angiography with TOF 3D magnetic resonance with and without contrast media (Gd-DTPA)].
Radiol Med. 1994 Mar;87(3):254-9.
9
[Breath-hold gadolinium enhanced tree-dimensional MR angiography: personal experience in the thoracic-abdominal area].屏气钆增强三维磁共振血管造影:胸腹区域的个人经验
Radiol Med. 1999 Oct;98(4):275-82.
10
[Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries].[对比剂增强磁共振血管造影在颈动脉研究中的应用]
Radiol Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;101(1-2):54-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: technique, guidelines and key applications.全身磁共振成像:技术、指南及关键应用
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Jan 7;15:1164. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1164. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparative evaluation of TEE, conventional MRI and contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MRA in the post-operative follow-up of dissecting aneurysms.经食管超声心动图(TEE)、传统磁共振成像(MRI)及对比增强三维屏气磁共振血管造影(MRA)在夹层动脉瘤术后随访中的对比评估
Int J Card Imaging. 2000 Jun;16(3):135-47. doi: 10.1023/a:1006404824873.