• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对100万美国人进行高血压筛查。社区高血压评估诊所(CHEC)项目,1973年至1975年。

Hypertension screening of 1 million Americans. Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) program, 1973 through 1975.

作者信息

Stamler J, Stamler R, Riedlinger W F, Algera G, Roberts R H

出版信息

JAMA. 1976 May 24;235(21):2299-306. doi: 10.1001/jama.235.21.2299.

DOI:10.1001/jama.235.21.2299
PMID:946622
Abstract

During 1973 through 1975, more than 1 million persons were screened in the nationwide Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) program at 1,171 sites. While those screened were not from defined populations, findings paralleled those of recent surveys of US population samples. First, CHEC confirmed the scope of the problem of elevated blood pressure in the United States. Of those screened, 247 of 1,000 had a diastolic reading of 90 mm Hg or higher; 116 of 1,000 had a reading of 95 mm Hg or greater. Prevalence of elevated blood pressure rose with age up to age 50 years, was higher in blacks than in whites, and was higher in men than in women. Second, CHEC data confirmed the challenge of undetected, untreated, and uncontrolled hypertension. Previously undetected hypertension was present in 27.7% of hypertensive people, detected but untreated in 10.7%, and treated but uncontrolled in 16.7%--totaling 55.1%.

摘要

在1973年至1975年期间,全国范围内的社区高血压评估诊所(CHEC)项目在1171个地点对超过100万人进行了筛查。虽然接受筛查的人群并非来自特定人群,但研究结果与近期美国人口样本调查的结果相似。首先,CHEC证实了美国高血压问题的严重程度。在接受筛查的人群中,每1000人中有247人舒张压读数为90毫米汞柱或更高;每1000人中有116人读数为95毫米汞柱或更高。高血压患病率随年龄增长至50岁,黑人高于白人,男性高于女性。其次,CHEC数据证实了未被发现、未治疗和未控制的高血压所带来的挑战。以前未被发现的高血压在27.7%的高血压患者中存在,已被发现但未治疗的占10.7%,已治疗但未得到控制的占16.7%——总计55.1%。

相似文献

1
Hypertension screening of 1 million Americans. Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) program, 1973 through 1975.对100万美国人进行高血压筛查。社区高血压评估诊所(CHEC)项目,1973年至1975年。
JAMA. 1976 May 24;235(21):2299-306. doi: 10.1001/jama.235.21.2299.
2
Blood pressure studies in 14 communities. A two-stage screen for hypertension.14个社区的血压研究。高血压的两阶段筛查。
JAMA. 1977 May 30;237(22):2385-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.1977.03270490025018.
3
Incorporating socio-economic and risk factor diversity into the development of an African-American community blood pressure control program.将社会经济和风险因素多样性纳入非裔美国人社区血压控制项目的开发中。
Ethn Dis. 1997 Autumn;7(3):175-83.
4
Nocturnal blood pressure in treated hypertensive African Americans Compared to treated hypertensive European Americans.接受治疗的非裔美国高血压患者与接受治疗的欧裔美国高血压患者的夜间血压比较。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Oct;7(10):2130-4. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V7102130.
5
Blood pressure levels, related factors, and hypertension control status of Japanese and Americans.日本人和美国人的血压水平、相关因素及高血压控制状况
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Aug;5(4):317-32.
6
Time trends in the US racial difference in hypertension.美国高血压种族差异的时间趋势。
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Nov;124(5):724-37. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114448.
7
Weight and blood pressure. Findings in hypertension screening of 1 million Americans.
JAMA. 1978 Oct 6;240(15):1607-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.240.15.1607.
8
Factors associated with hypertension control in the general population of the United States.美国普通人群中与高血压控制相关的因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2002 May 13;162(9):1051-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.9.1051.
9
The Charlottesville Blood-Pressure Survey. Value of repeated blood-pressure measurements.夏洛茨维尔血压调查。重复测量血压的价值。
JAMA. 1976 Aug 16;236(7):847-51.
10
Colon cancer screening consultations may identify racial disparity in hypertension diagnosis and management.结肠癌筛查咨询可能会发现高血压诊断和管理方面的种族差异。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 May;99(5):525-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in blood pressure regulation and hypertension: renal, hemodynamic, and hormonal mechanisms.血压调节和高血压中的性别差异:肾脏、血液动力学和激素机制。
Physiol Rev. 2024 Jan 1;104(1):199-251. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2022. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
2
Sex and gender differences in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: An update.心肌炎和扩张型心肌病中的性别差异:最新进展
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 2;10:1129348. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1129348. eCollection 2023.
3
Sex differences in solute and water handling in the human kidney: Modeling and functional implications.
人类肾脏中溶质和水处理的性别差异:建模与功能意义
iScience. 2021 May 29;24(6):102667. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102667. eCollection 2021 Jun 25.
4
A Computational Model of Kidney Function in a Patient with Diabetes.糖尿病患者肾功能的计算模型。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 29;22(11):5819. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115819.
5
Considering Sex as a Biological Variable in Basic and Clinical Studies: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement.将性别视为基础和临床研究中的生物学变量:内分泌学会科学声明。
Endocr Rev. 2021 May 25;42(3):219-258. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa034.
6
Sex differences in solute transport along the nephrons: effects of Na transport inhibition.沿肾单位溶质转运的性别差异:钠转运抑制的影响。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020 Sep 1;319(3):F487-F505. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00240.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Androgen-Regulated Cardiac Metabolism in Aging Men.雄激素调控衰老男性的心脏代谢
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 May 15;11:316. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00316. eCollection 2020.
8
Impact of a Patient-Centered Behavioral Economics Intervention on Hypertension Control in a Highly Disadvantaged Population: a Randomized Trial.以患者为中心的行为经济学干预对高度弱势群体高血压控制的影响:一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):70-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05269-z. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Gender disparities in midlife hypertension: a review of the evidence on the Arab region.中年高血压中的性别差异:阿拉伯地区证据综述
Womens Midlife Health. 2017 May 4;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40695-017-0020-z. eCollection 2017.
10
Sex-specific differences in hypertension and associated cardiovascular disease.性别特异性高血压与相关心血管疾病的差异。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Mar;14(3):185-201. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.189. Epub 2018 Jan 30.