• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食蚊鱼(盖氏食蚊鱼)对36氯毒杀芬的摄取。

Uptake of 36Cl-toxaphene in mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis.

作者信息

Schaper R A, Crowder L A

出版信息

Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1976 May;15(5):581-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01685708.

DOI:10.1007/BF01685708
PMID:946771
Abstract

The toxicity syndrome of toxaphene to G. affinis was divided into 5 stages, and the residue level at each stage was determined. By the time fish were exhibiting the first toxicity response (stage 2), 90.3% of the mean fatal residue level had been sorbed. Regression analysis indicated that sorption of toxaphene is a linear function with respect to time. Excretion was not observed following an 8 hour exposure to 2ppm toxaphene. Metabolic alteration of toxaphene during the experiments appeared to be minimal. Differences in individual mortality appeared to be due to differences in uptake rather than differences in ability to tolerate particular body loads of toxaphene.

摘要

毒杀芬对细纹鳊鮈的毒性综合征分为5个阶段,并测定了每个阶段的残留水平。当鱼表现出最初的毒性反应(第2阶段)时,已吸附了平均致死残留水平的90.3%。回归分析表明,毒杀芬的吸附是一个关于时间的线性函数。在暴露于2ppm毒杀芬8小时后未观察到排泄现象。实验过程中毒杀芬的代谢变化似乎很小。个体死亡率的差异似乎是由于吸收量的不同,而不是耐受毒杀芬特定体内负荷能力的差异。

相似文献

1
Uptake of 36Cl-toxaphene in mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis.食蚊鱼(盖氏食蚊鱼)对36氯毒杀芬的摄取。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1976 May;15(5):581-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01685708.
2
Uptake of 36CL-toxaphene in the cockroach, Leucophaea maderae (Fabr.).
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1977 Dec;18(6):766-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01691990.
3
Excretion and storage of [14C]toxaphene and two isolated [14C]toxaphene fractions.[14C]毒杀芬及两个分离出的[14C]毒杀芬组分的排泄与储存
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1980 Jan;6(1):127-40. doi: 10.1080/15287398009529836.
4
Fate of 36C1-toxaphene in rats.三十六氯毒杀芬在大鼠体内的代谢情况
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1974 Sep;12(3):320-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01709126.
5
Metabolic dechlorination of toxaphene in rats.大鼠体内毒杀芬的代谢脱氯作用
J Agric Food Chem. 1975 Jan-Feb;23(1):98-106. doi: 10.1021/jf60197a021.
6
Tissue residue studies on toxaphene in broiler chickens.肉鸡中毒杀芬的组织残留研究。
J Agric Food Chem. 1978 Jan-Feb;26(1):126-30. doi: 10.1021/jf60215a064.
7
The use of uniform labeling with zinc-65 to measure stable zinc turnover in the mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis--I. Retention.
Health Phys. 1977 May;32(5):381-7. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197705000-00004.
8
Widespread occurrence of the pesticide toxaphene in Canadian east coast marine fish.杀虫剂毒杀芬在加拿大东海岸海洋鱼类中的广泛存在。
Int J Environ Anal Chem. 1983;14(2):117-26. doi: 10.1080/03067318308071613.
9
Toxaphene insecticide: a complex biodegradable mixture.毒杀芬杀虫剂:一种复杂的可生物降解混合物。
Science. 1974 Feb 8;183(4124):520-1. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4124.520.
10
Reproduction and residue accumulation in black ducks fed toxaphene.毒杀芬喂养的黑鸭的繁殖与残留积累
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1980;9(4):461-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01055298.

本文引用的文献

1
Vertebrate insecticide resistance: the in vitro endrin effect on succinic dehydrogenase activity on endrin-resistant and susceptible mosquitofish.脊椎动物的杀虫剂抗性:异狄氏剂对异狄氏剂抗性和敏感食蚊鱼琥珀酸脱氢酶活性的体外作用。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1971 Mar-Apr;6(2):171-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01540101.
2
Retention of 14 C-DDT in cellular fractions of vertebrate insecticide-resistant and susceptible fish.14C-滴滴涕在脊椎动物抗杀虫剂和敏感鱼类细胞组分中的滞留情况。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1972 Jul;22(3):409-14. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(72)90246-3.
3
In vivo and in vitro retention of ( 14 C)aldrin and ( 14 C)dieldrin in cellular fractions from brain and liver tissues of insecticide-resistant and susceptible Gambusia.
抗杀虫剂和敏感型食蚊鱼脑和肝组织细胞组分中(14C)艾氏剂和(14C)狄氏剂的体内和体外滞留情况
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1973 Feb;24(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(73)90139-7.
4
Metabolic dechlorination of toxaphene in rats.大鼠体内毒杀芬的代谢脱氯作用
J Agric Food Chem. 1975 Jan-Feb;23(1):98-106. doi: 10.1021/jf60197a021.