Dombernowsky P, Smith I, Falkson G, Leonard R, Panasci L, Bellmunt J, Bezwoda W, Gardin G, Gudgeon A, Morgan M, Fornasiero A, Hoffmann W, Michel J, Hatschek T, Tjabbes T, Chaudri H A, Hornberger U, Trunet P F
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):453-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.453.
To compare two doses of letrozole and megestrol acetate (MA) as second-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with antiestrogens.
Five hundred fifty-one patients with locally advanced, locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive letrozole 2.5 mg (n = 174), letrozole 0.5 mg (n = 188), or MA 160 mg (n = 189) once daily in a double-blind, multicenter trial. Data were analyzed for tumor response and safety variables up to 33 months of follow-up evaluation and for survival up to 45 months.
Letrozole 2.5 mg produced a significantly higher overall objective response rate (24%) compared with MA (16%; logistic regression, P = .04) or letrozole 0.5 mg (13%; P = .004). Duration of objective response was significantly longer for letrozole 2.5 mg compared with MA (Cox regression, P = .02). Letrozole 2.5 mg was significantly superior to MA and letrozole 0.5 mg in time to treatment failure (P = .04 and P = .002, respectively). For time to progression, letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to letrozole 0.5 mg (P = .02), but not to MA (P = .07). There was a significant dose effect in overall survival in favor of letrozole 2.5 mg (P = .03) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg. Letrozole was significantly better tolerated than MA with respect to serious adverse experiences, discontinuation due to poor tolerability, cardiovascular side effects, and weight gain.
The data show letrozole 2.5 mg once daily to be more effective and better tolerated than MA in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with antiestrogens.
比较两种剂量的来曲唑与醋酸甲地孕酮(MA)作为二线治疗药物,用于先前接受过抗雌激素治疗的绝经后晚期乳腺癌女性患者的疗效。
在一项双盲、多中心试验中,551例局部晚期、局部区域复发或转移性乳腺癌患者被随机分配,分别接受每日一次的来曲唑2.5mg(n = 174)、来曲唑0.5mg(n = 188)或MA 160mg(n = 189)治疗。对数据进行分析,评估长达33个月随访期内的肿瘤反应和安全性变量,以及长达45个月的生存期。
与MA(16%;逻辑回归,P = 0.04)或来曲唑0.5mg(13%;P = 0.004)相比,来曲唑2.5mg产生的总体客观缓解率显著更高(24%)。来曲唑2.5mg的客观缓解持续时间显著长于MA(Cox回归,P = 0.02)。来曲唑2.5mg在至治疗失败时间方面显著优于MA和来曲唑0.5mg(分别为P = 0.04和P = 0.002)。在至疾病进展时间方面,来曲唑2.5mg优于来曲唑0.5mg(P = 0.02),但不优于MA(P = 0.07)。在总生存期方面,与来曲唑0.5mg相比,来曲唑2.5mg存在显著的剂量效应优势(P = 0.03)。在严重不良事件、因耐受性差而停药、心血管副作用和体重增加方面,来曲唑的耐受性明显优于MA。
数据表明,对于先前接受过抗雌激素治疗的绝经后晚期乳腺癌女性患者,每日一次服用2.5mg来曲唑比MA更有效且耐受性更好。