Suppr超能文献

泰国市售苯妥英钠胶囊的生物利用度。第二部分:体内研究。

Bioavailability of phenytoin sodium capsules available in Thailand. Part II: In vivo study.

作者信息

Suthisisang C, Payakachat N, Chulavatnatol S, Towanabut S

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 1998 Jan;81(1):64-70.

PMID:9470324
Abstract

Four phenytoin brands, dilantin and three local brands (brand A, B and C) were selected for the bioavailability study. The study was carried out in 16 healthy male Thai volunteers with the average age of 21 years old. A single oral dose of 300 mg (three capsules of 100-mg) phenytoin sodium was given to subjects following an 8 hour-overnight fast. The tested drugs were given in a single-blind randomized crossover with at least 2 weeks of washout period. Venous blood samples of approximately 5 ml were drawn before medication and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post dosing. Plasma phenytoin concentrations were determined by HPLC assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma-concentration time curve of an innovator brand, dilantin, by PCNONLIN program. Elimination rate constant and half-life were 0.2 h-1 and 19 h, respectively. The maximum concentration (Cmax) and time to peak (Tmax) were 1.98 micrograms/ml and 9.6 h, respectively. Bioavailability study was determined by comparing the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) by using ANOVA. The result indicated that two local brands (brand A and brand C) were not bioequivalent to the innovator in terms of Cmax and AUC0-alpha, whereas Tmax was not significantly different among these 4 brands. Cmax and AUC of brand A and C were significantly higher than the innovator brand. In addition, the plasma concentration time profile of brand C was also different from other brands with the steep peak which yielded a Cmax value double that of the Cmax of the innovator. However, brand B (from Research and Development Institute, Government Pharmaceutical Organization) was bioequivalent to dilantin after 4 times of product formulation adjustment. This present study demonstrated that the local products (brand A and brand C) were not bioequivalent with the innovator. Thus, the interchange from one brand to another must be performed cautiously or should be avoided, otherwise phenytoin blood levels should be monitored closely together with the clinical signs and symptoms of the patients.

摘要

选取了4种苯妥英品牌,即狄兰汀和3种本地品牌(品牌A、B和C)进行生物利用度研究。该研究在16名健康的泰国男性志愿者中进行,他们的平均年龄为21岁。在禁食8小时过夜后,给受试者单次口服300毫克(3粒100毫克胶囊)苯妥英钠。受试药物采用单盲随机交叉给药,洗脱期至少为2周。在给药前以及给药后1、2、4、6、8、10、12、24、48和72小时采集约5毫升静脉血样。采用高效液相色谱法测定血浆苯妥英浓度。通过PCNONLIN程序根据创新品牌狄兰汀的血浆浓度-时间曲线计算药代动力学参数。消除速率常数和半衰期分别为0.2 h-1和19小时。最大浓度(Cmax)和达峰时间(Tmax)分别为1.98微克/毫升和9.6小时。通过方差分析比较血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)、最大血浆浓度(Cmax)和达到最大血浆浓度的时间(Tmax)来确定生物利用度研究。结果表明,两个本地品牌(品牌A和C)在Cmax和AUC0-α方面与创新品牌不等效,而这4个品牌之间的Tmax无显著差异。品牌A和C的Cmax和AUC显著高于创新品牌。此外,品牌C的血浆浓度-时间曲线也与其他品牌不同,其峰值陡峭,Cmax值是创新品牌Cmax的两倍。然而,品牌B(来自政府制药组织研发机构)在产品配方调整4次后与狄兰汀生物等效。本研究表明,本地产品(品牌A和C)与创新品牌不等效。因此,必须谨慎进行品牌间的互换或应避免互换,否则应密切监测患者的苯妥英血药浓度以及临床体征和症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验