• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现场护理人员违背医疗建议让院前患者出院的结局研究。

Outcome study of prehospital patients signed out against medical advice by field paramedics.

作者信息

Moss S T, Chan T C, Buchanan J, Dunford J V, Vilke G M

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine University of California, San Diego, Medical Center 92103, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):247-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70315-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70315-4
PMID:9472189
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the incidence and demographic data of prehospital patients who contact paramedics by way of the 911 system, refuse transport against medical advice (AMA), then call 911 and are subsequently reevaluated by paramedics in the following 48 hours.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational review of records using the San Diego County Quality Assurance Network database for prehospital providers. All paramedic 911 responses that made base hospital contact over a 3-month period were reviewed to identify patients who signed out AMA. The main outcome measure was to identify patients who signed out AMA and then called 911 again within 48 hours. The demographics, complaints, treatments, and dispositions of these patients are described.

RESULTS

Of 6,512 total 911 responses reviewed, 443 (7%) involved patients who signed out AMA. Of these patients, 156 cases (35.2%) were listed as trauma and 287 (64.8%) were medical, with cardiac chest pain, seizure, and respiratory distress/shortness of breath the most frequently noted medical subcategories. Fifty-one (11.5%) such patients received treatment; 34 received dextrose, 12 naloxone, 4 albuterol, and 1 a splint. Patient names were available in 5,515, of the total 6,512 responses and 431 of the 443 AMA cases, permitting computer searching of reevaluations by paramedics. Of the 431 AMA patients for whom a name was available, 10 (2%) called 911 again within 48 hours. All 10 callbacks were made for a related chief compliant, and all 10 of these patients were transported (4 admitted to hospital, 1 died en route, 1 transferred to another facility, 4 discharged from the ED). Of these 10 patients, 7 (70%) were older than 65 years, compared with 17% of all AMA patients older than 65 years.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our findings, patients over the age of 65 years have a propensity to recontact paramedics and should be aggressively encouraged to seek emergency medical treatment. Future prospective studies should be mounted to examine at patient outcome and to assess why patients sign out AMA after making contact with paramedics.

摘要

研究目的

描述通过911系统联系护理人员、违背医嘱拒绝转运(AMA)、随后拨打911并在接下来48小时内接受护理人员再次评估的院前患者的发病率和人口统计学数据。

方法

我们使用圣地亚哥县院前急救人员质量保证网络数据库对记录进行了回顾性观察性研究。对3个月内所有与基地医院取得联系的护理人员911响应记录进行审查,以确定签署AMA出院的患者。主要观察指标是确定签署AMA出院并在48小时内再次拨打911的患者。描述了这些患者的人口统计学特征、主诉、治疗情况和处置方式。

结果

在审查的6512次911响应中,443次(7%)涉及签署AMA出院的患者。在这些患者中,156例(35.2%)被列为创伤患者,287例(64.8%)为内科患者,其内科亚类中最常见的是心前区疼痛、癫痫发作以及呼吸窘迫/呼吸急促。51例(11.5%)此类患者接受了治疗;34例接受了葡萄糖治疗,12例接受了纳洛酮治疗,4例接受了沙丁胺醇治疗,1例接受了夹板固定。在总共6512次响应中的5515次以及443例AMA病例中的431例中可以获取患者姓名,从而能够通过计算机搜索护理人员的再次评估记录。在有姓名记录的431例AMA患者中,10例(2%)在48小时内再次拨打了911。所有10次回电均是因为相关的主要主诉,并且这10例患者均被转运(4例入院,1例在途中死亡,1例转至另一机构,4例从急诊科出院)。在这10例患者中,7例(70%)年龄超过65岁,而在所有年龄超过65岁的AMA患者中这一比例为17%。

结论

根据我们的研究结果,65岁以上的患者有再次联系护理人员的倾向,应积极鼓励他们寻求紧急医疗救治。未来应开展前瞻性研究,以检查患者的治疗结果,并评估患者在与护理人员接触后签署AMA出院的原因。

相似文献

1
Outcome study of prehospital patients signed out against medical advice by field paramedics.现场护理人员违背医疗建议让院前患者出院的结局研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):247-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70315-4.
2
Assessing the Risk of Prehospital Administration of Naloxone with Subsequent Refusal of Care.评估院前使用纳洛酮后拒绝治疗的风险。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Sep-Oct;20(5):566-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1142626. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
Are heroin overdose deaths related to patient release after prehospital treatment with naloxone?纳洛酮院前治疗后患者出院与海洛因过量致死有关吗?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999 Jul-Sep;3(3):183-6. doi: 10.1080/10903129908958933.
4
Outcome study of minors after parental refusal of paramedic transport.父母拒绝医护人员转运后未成年人的结局研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):278-83. doi: 10.1080/10903120190939797.
5
Assessment for deaths in out-of-hospital heroin overdose patients treated with naloxone who refuse transport.对接受纳洛酮治疗但拒绝转运的院外海洛因过量使用患者的死亡情况评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):893-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00636.x.
6
Predictors of pediatric emergency patients discharged against medical advice.违背医嘱出院的儿科急诊患者的预测因素。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Apr;48(3):263-70. doi: 10.1177/0009922808323109. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
7
Accuracy of stroke recognition by emergency medical dispatchers and paramedics--San Diego experience.紧急医疗调度员和护理人员对中风识别的准确性——圣地亚哥的经验
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):307-13. doi: 10.1080/10903120802099526.
8
Patient-initiated refusals of prehospital care: ambulance call report documentation, patient outcome, and on-line medical command.患者主动拒绝院前护理:救护车呼叫报告记录、患者结局及在线医疗指挥
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995 Jan-Mar;10(1):3-9. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0004156x.
9
Can paramedics using guidelines accurately triage patients?使用指南的护理人员能否准确地对患者进行分诊?
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;38(3):268-77. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.117198.
10
Is it Appropriate for Patients to be Discharged at the Scene by Paramedics?是否应该由急救人员在现场为患者办理出院?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):539-49. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1128028. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Transport Refusal during the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea.韩国京畿道在 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段的紧急转运拒绝事件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8444. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148444.
2
A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review.从患者安全和专业角度看待救护车转运中的非转运问题:系统综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jul 17;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6.
3
Prehospital Care for the Adult and Pediatric Seizure Patient: Current Evidence-based Recommendations.
成人及儿童癫痫患者的院前护理:当前基于证据的建议
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;18(3):419-436. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.12.32066. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
4
Patients refusing prehospital transport are increasingly likely to be geriatric.拒绝院前转运的患者越来越有可能是老年人。
Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:905976. doi: 10.1155/2012/905976. Epub 2012 Feb 19.