• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

'Rationing' health care. Not all definitions are created equal.

作者信息

Ubel P A, Goold S D

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1998 Feb 9;158(3):209-14. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.3.209.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.158.3.209
PMID:9472199
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
'Rationing' health care. Not all definitions are created equal.医疗保健的“配给”。并非所有定义都是一样的。
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Feb 9;158(3):209-14. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.3.209.
2
Health care rationing: a critical evaluation.医疗保健资源分配：批判性评估。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1991 Summer;10(2):88-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.10.2.88.
3
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.配给制辩论。按年龄配给医疗保健服务。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.
4
Rationing health care: will it be necessary? Can it be done without age or disability discrimination?医疗资源配给：这有必要吗？能否在不歧视年龄或残疾的情况下做到？
Issues Law Med. 1989 Winter;5(3):337-66.
5
When the limits are not their own: why the elderly must participate in health care reform.当界限不由他们自己设定时：为何老年人必须参与医疗改革。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Apr;41(4):462-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06959.x.
6
Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Principles for making difficult decisions in difficult times.临床决策：从理论到实践。在困难时期做出艰难决策的原则。
JAMA. 1994 Jun 8;271(22):1792-8.
7
The ethics of excess.过度的伦理。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 Nov-Dec;24(6):14.
8
Rationing in The Netherlands: the liberal and the communitarian perspective.荷兰的配给制：自由主义与社群主义视角
Health Care Anal. 1993 Jun;1(1):53-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02196971.
9
Equitable distribution of limited medical resources. American Geriatrics Society Public Policy Committee.有限医疗资源的公平分配。美国老年医学会公共政策委员会。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Nov;37(11):1063-4.
10
Wanted: a clearly articulated social ethic for American health care.招聘：为美国医疗保健制定一套清晰明确的社会伦理准则。
JAMA. 1997 Nov 5;278(17):1446-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Hidden bedside rationing in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey among physicians in internal medicine.荷兰隐蔽的床边资源分配：一项针对内科医生的横断面调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06229-2.
2
Attitudes on cost-effectiveness and equity: a cross-sectional study examining the viewpoints of medical professionals.对成本效益和公平性的态度：一项调查医学专业人员观点的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 1;7(7):e017251. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017251.
3
Financial Toxicity of Cancer Drugs: Possible Remedies from an Ethical Perspective.
癌症药物的经济毒性：从伦理角度看可能的补救措施
Breast Care (Basel). 2017 May;12(2):81-85. doi: 10.1159/000471506. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Rationing of Care: Conceptual Ambiguity and Transparency in Data Collection and Synthesis.医疗资源配给：数据收集与综合中的概念模糊性与透明度
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1415-1416. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3801-4.
5
Readiness of hospital-based internists to embrace and discuss high-value care with patients and family members: a single-centre cross-sectional survey study.
CMAJ Open. 2015 Nov 4;3(4):E382-6. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150024. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.
6
A survey of Ethiopian physicians' experiences of bedside rationing: extensive resource scarcity, tough decisions and adverse consequences.一项关于埃塞俄比亚医生床边资源分配经历的调查：资源极度稀缺、艰难决策及不良后果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 14;15:467. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1131-6.
7
Does the perception of fairness and standard of care in the health system depend on the field of study? Results of an empirical analysis.卫生系统中对公平性和医疗服务标准的认知是否取决于研究领域？实证分析结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 12;14:166. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-166.
8
[Rationalization and rationing at the bedside. A normative and empirical status quo analysis].[床边的合理化与配给。规范与实证现状分析]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2014 Feb;109(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s00063-013-0279-2. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
9
How can bedside rationing be justified despite coexisting inefficiency? The need for 'benchmarks of efficiency'.尽管存在效率低下，床边配给制如何能被证明是合理的？需要“效率基准”。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Feb;40(2):89-93. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100769. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10
The role of ethics committees and ethics consultation in allocation decisions: a 4-stage process.伦理委员会和伦理咨询在分配决策中的作用：四阶段过程。
Med Care. 2010 Sep;48(9):821-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e577fb.