Fletcher C D
Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1997;81:318-26.
Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of soft tissue tumours has yielded a wealth of new information over the past 10-15 years. Many soft tissue neoplasms show specific karyotypic aberrations which have proved to be diagnostically valuable, and have also assisted in the understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms and rationalisation of classification systems (e.g. lipomatous tumours and Ewing's sarcoma/PNET). In certain clinical subsets, especially round cell sarcomas and fatty neoplasms, determination of karyotype (whether by conventional analysis, FISH or RT-PCR) has proved often to be useful in the diagnostic setting. Additionally the recognition of clonal abnormalities in both benign neoplasms as well as lesions formerly thought to be non-neoplastic (e.g. inflammatory "pseudotumour") has prompted reassessment of biologic concepts with regard to growth control. Inherited molecular genetic defects which predispose to soft tissue neoplasia (e.g. NF-1, Li-Fraumeni syndrome) have been characterised, leading to a greater understanding of tumour suppressor genes. Mesenchymal differentiation genes, the modes of action of which may help to expunge concepts of histogenesis, are being characterised. It is becoming clear that there exist growth control genes (such as the HMGI family) which, irrespective of differentiation, play an important role in a wide range of different mesenchymal tumours. Additionally it is evident that different histologic types of sarcoma (e.g. variants of liposarcoma) show quite different abnormalities of cell cycle control (notably at the G1-S checkpoint) and it seems increasingly likely that certain genetic aberrations, identifiable either at the chromosomal or individual gene level, may prove to be of prognostic relevance in sarcomas and may also open novel therapeutic avenues. While the validity of all molecular genetic data depends totally on skilled histological diagnosis and grading, there has never been a better time for close collaboration between pathologists and basic scientists in the study of soft tissue neoplasia.
在过去10到15年里,软组织肿瘤的细胞遗传学和分子分析产生了大量新信息。许多软组织肿瘤显示出特定的核型畸变,这些畸变已被证明具有诊断价值,还有助于理解发病机制以及使分类系统合理化(如脂肪瘤和尤因肉瘤/原始神经外胚层肿瘤)。在某些临床亚组中,特别是圆形细胞肉瘤和脂肪性肿瘤,核型测定(无论是通过传统分析、荧光原位杂交还是逆转录聚合酶链反应)在诊断中常常被证明是有用的。此外,在良性肿瘤以及以前被认为是非肿瘤性的病变(如炎性“假瘤”)中识别出克隆异常,促使人们重新评估生长控制方面的生物学概念。已对易患软组织肿瘤形成的遗传性分子遗传缺陷(如神经纤维瘤病1型、李-佛美尼综合征)进行了特征描述,从而加深了对肿瘤抑制基因的理解。间充质分化基因正在被特征化,其作用方式可能有助于消除组织发生学概念。越来越明显的是,存在一些生长控制基因(如高迁移率族蛋白I家族),它们无论分化情况如何,在广泛的不同间充质肿瘤中都起着重要作用。此外,很明显不同组织学类型的肉瘤(如脂肪肉瘤的变异型)显示出细胞周期控制的截然不同的异常(特别是在G1-S检查点),而且越来越有可能的是,在染色体或单个基因水平上可识别的某些遗传畸变在肉瘤中可能具有预后相关性,并且还可能开辟新的治疗途径。虽然所有分子遗传数据的有效性完全取决于熟练的组织学诊断和分级,但在软组织肿瘤研究中,病理学家和基础科学家之间紧密合作的时机再好不过了。