Antonescu C R
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Histopathology. 2006 Jan;48(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02285.x.
Soft tissue tumours represent a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal lesions and their classification continues to evolve as a result of incorporating advances in cytogenetic and molecular techniques. In the last decade traditional diagnostic approaches were supplemented with a significant number of reliable molecular diagnostic tools, detecting tumour type-specific genetic alterations. In addition, the successful application of some of these techniques to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue made it possible to subject a broader range of clinical material to molecular analysis. Thus, molecular genetics has already become an integral part of the work-up in some tumours, such as paediatric small blue round cell tumours, which demonstrate characteristic translocations. Several lines of evidence suggest that sarcomas can be divided into two major genetic groups: (i) sarcomas with specific genetic alterations and usually simple karyotypes, such as reciprocal chromosomal translocations (e.g. FUS-DDIT3 in myxoid liposarcoma) and specific oncogenic mutations (e.g. KIT mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumours); and (i) sarcomas with non-specific genetic alterations and complex unbalanced karyotypes. Some of these genetic abnormalities, including chromosomal numerical changes, translocations, gene amplifications or large deletions can be apparent at the cytogenetic level (karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization), while others, such as small deletions, insertions or point mutations, require molecular genetic techniques (polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis). This review focuses on the applicability of genetic testing in the diagnosis and prognosis of soft tissue sarcomas, and gives a realistic appraisal of the ancillary role of molecular techniques, including its advantages and limitations.
软组织肿瘤是一组异质性的间充质病变,随着细胞遗传学和分子技术的进步,其分类也在不断演变。在过去十年中,传统诊断方法得到了大量可靠的分子诊断工具的补充,这些工具可检测肿瘤类型特异性的基因改变。此外,其中一些技术在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织中的成功应用,使得更广泛的临床材料能够进行分子分析。因此,分子遗传学已经成为某些肿瘤诊断工作中不可或缺的一部分,比如小儿小蓝圆细胞肿瘤,这类肿瘤具有特征性的易位。有几条证据表明,肉瘤可分为两个主要的基因组:(i)具有特定基因改变且通常核型简单的肉瘤,如相互染色体易位(如黏液样脂肪肉瘤中的FUS-DDIT3)和特定的致癌突变(如胃肠道间质瘤中的KIT突变);以及(ii)具有非特异性基因改变和复杂不平衡核型的肉瘤。其中一些基因异常,包括染色体数目变化、易位、基因扩增或大片段缺失,在细胞遗传学水平(核型分析、荧光原位杂交)上可能很明显,而其他一些异常,如小片段缺失、插入或点突变,则需要分子遗传学技术(聚合酶链反应和序列分析)。本综述重点关注基因检测在软组织肉瘤诊断和预后中的适用性,并对分子技术的辅助作用进行了实际评估,包括其优点和局限性。