Cobo Reinoso P, Aguado García J M, Lumbreras Bermejo C, Pérez Vela J L, Caballero Cubedo R, Sanz Sanz F, Noriega Rodríguez A R
Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
Rev Clin Esp. 1997 Dec;197(12):799-803.
To analyze the epidemiologic characteristics of non-neutropenic patients with candidemia in a general hospital and the advantages and disadvantages of treatment with amphotericin B or fluconazole.
A total of 62 adult non-neutropenic patients with candidemia and treated with amphotericin B (n = 35) or fluconazole (n = 27) were studied. All episodes were considered to be associated with infection in a vein catheter. The demographic characteristics, risk factors for the development of candidemia, Candida species recovered from blood culture, underlying diseases, and clinical manifestations in both groups were compared. The evolution regarding secondary effects developed with both drugs, therapy failures, long term complications, and overall mortality rate associated with candidemia were analyzed.
Both groups were comparable with the exception of the percentage of patients infected with species different from Candida albicans, which was higher in the group of patients who received amphotericin B (57%) than in the fluconazole group (26%) (p = 0.02), and in that patients with severe renal failure or AIDS had received preferentially fluconazole. There were no statistically significant differences regarding the evolution of patients treated with amphotericin B or fluconazole with the following factors: therapy failure (27% versus 19%; p = 0.7), overall mortality rate (40% versus 44%; p = 0.6), and mortality directly related to candidemia (33% versus 30%). Mortality was significantly higher among patients who had not their vein catheters removed early (78%) compared with those who had their vein catheters removed early (34%) (p = 0.01). Sixty-six percent of patients treated with amphotericin developed some severe secondary effect, whereas no patient in the fluconazole group developed such effects.
Both amphotericin B and fluconazole seem to be effective drugs for the treatment of vein catheter related candidemia in the non-neutropenic patient, although fluconazole is far less toxic. The early removal of the vein catheter plays a prognostic role with at least the same relevance than the type of antifungal therapy chosen.
分析综合医院非中性粒细胞减少的念珠菌血症患者的流行病学特征以及两性霉素B或氟康唑治疗的优缺点。
共研究了62例成年非中性粒细胞减少的念珠菌血症患者,其中35例接受两性霉素B治疗,27例接受氟康唑治疗。所有病例均被认为与静脉导管感染有关。比较了两组患者的人口统计学特征、念珠菌血症发生的危险因素、血培养分离出的念珠菌种类、基础疾病及临床表现。分析了两种药物产生的副作用、治疗失败、长期并发症以及与念珠菌血症相关的总体死亡率的演变情况。
除感染非白色念珠菌的患者百分比外,两组具有可比性。接受两性霉素B治疗的患者中该比例为57%,高于氟康唑组的26%(p = 0.02),且严重肾衰竭或艾滋病患者优先接受氟康唑治疗。接受两性霉素B或氟康唑治疗的患者在以下方面的病情演变无统计学显著差异:治疗失败(27%对19%;p = 0.7)、总体死亡率(40%对44%;p = 0.6)以及与念珠菌血症直接相关的死亡率(33%对30%)。未早期拔除静脉导管的患者死亡率(78%)显著高于早期拔除静脉导管的患者(34%)(p = 0.01)。接受两性霉素治疗的患者中有66%出现了一些严重的副作用,而氟康唑组无患者出现此类副作用。
两性霉素B和氟康唑似乎都是治疗非中性粒细胞减少患者静脉导管相关念珠菌血症的有效药物,尽管氟康唑的毒性要小得多。早期拔除静脉导管与所选抗真菌治疗类型至少具有相同的预后作用。