• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹股沟疝门诊手术的组织与结果]

[Organization and results of ambulatory surgery for inguinal hernia].

作者信息

Bech K, Callesen T, Nielsen R, Roikjaer O, Andersen J, Hesselfeldt P, Kehlet H

机构信息

H:S Hvidovre Hospital, kirurgisk gastroenterologisk afdeling.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Feb 9;160(7):1014-8.

PMID:9477751
Abstract

The results of a reorganization of surgery for inguinal hernias within a department of surgical gastroenterology were assessed concerning staff simplifications, feasibility, patient satisfaction, safety, complications and resources. Five hundred consecutive, elective, open operations for unilateral reducible inguinal hernias were performed in 466 patients under local anaesthesia in an ambulatory setup. One hundred and fourteen of the operations were for a recurrent hernia. The median age was 60 years (44-74 years as 25% and 75% quartiles). Two of the operations were converted to general anaesthesia. The patients were discharged 85 min (median) post-operatively, but 12 patients were not discharged on the same day. Bleeding or wound infections in need of treatment were seen postoperatively in 1.6% and 1.6%, respectively. All patients were given a postoperative questionnaires with a response rate of 95%, 89% of the respondents were satisfied with the whole procedure, 11% were dissatisfied. A reorganization of surgery for inguinal hernias to a standardized ambulatory setup induced staff simplifications and saved resources with a preserved high patient satisfaction, safety and a low complication rate.

摘要

对外科胃肠病学部门腹股沟疝手术的重组结果,从人员精简、可行性、患者满意度、安全性、并发症及资源方面进行了评估。在门诊环境下,对466例患者进行了500例连续、择期、单侧可复性腹股沟疝的开放手术,其中114例为复发性疝手术。年龄中位数为60岁(四分位数间距为44 - 74岁)。2例手术转为全身麻醉。患者术后中位数85分钟出院,但有12例患者未在同一天出院。术后分别有1.6%的患者出现需要治疗的出血或伤口感染。所有患者均收到术后问卷,回复率为95%,89%的受访者对整个手术过程满意,11%不满意。将腹股沟疝手术重组为标准化门诊模式可实现人员精简并节省资源,同时保持较高的患者满意度、安全性及较低的并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
[Organization and results of ambulatory surgery for inguinal hernia].[腹股沟疝门诊手术的组织与结果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Feb 9;160(7):1014-8.
2
[Recurrence of inguinal hernia: ambulatory surgery under local anesthesia].[腹股沟疝复发:局部麻醉下的门诊手术]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1996 Dec 2;158(49):7057-60.
3
Feasibility of local infiltration anaesthesia for recurrent groin hernia repair.局部浸润麻醉用于复发性腹股沟疝修补术的可行性
Eur J Surg. 2001 Nov;167(11):851-4. doi: 10.1080/11024150152717698.
4
"One step procedure" local anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in ambulatory surgery conditions--district general hospital experience.日间手术条件下腹股沟疝修补术的“一步法”局部麻醉——地区综合医院经验
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2012;59(1):87-93.
5
One-thousand consecutive inguinal hernia repairs under unmonitored local anesthesia.
Anesth Analg. 2001 Dec;93(6):1373-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200112000-00004.
6
Inguinal hernia repair: anaesthesia, pain and convalescence.腹股沟疝修补术:麻醉、疼痛与康复
Dan Med Bull. 2003 Aug;50(3):203-18.
7
[National project for the management of clinical processes. Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia].
Cir Esp. 2005 Apr;77(4):194-202. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(05)70837-x.
8
[Evaluation of inguinal hernia management in ambulatory surgery].
Ann Chir. 2004 Apr;129(3):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.01.012.
9
The feasibility, safety and cost of infiltration anaesthesia for hernia repair. Hvidovre Hospital Hernia Group.疝修补术中浸润麻醉的可行性、安全性及成本。维德夫勒医院疝病治疗组
Anaesthesia. 1998 Jan;53(1):31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1998.00244.x.
10
First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure--quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients.采用超普网片行李chtenstein疝修补术作为节省成本手术的初步结果——对一系列门诊手术患者结合改良生活质量问卷(SF-36)进行质量控制
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Jun 30;9(6):323-7.