Lloyd A, Jaunberzins A, Dhopatkar A, Bryant S, Dummer P M
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Int Endod J. 1997 Jan;30(1):16-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb01094.x.
The aim of this study was to assess the shaping ability of the M4 reciprocating handpiece and Safety Hedstrom files in simulated canals. A total of 40 simulated canals of various angles and positions of curvature were prepared with an M4 handpiece using Safety Hedstrom files oriented with the ground, flattened surface towards the inner aspect of the curve. A standard regimen was adopted throughout. Pre- and post-operative longitudinal images of the canals were taken with a video camera and stored and manipulated in a computer with image analysis software. The presence of canal aberrations and the amount and location of resin material removed as a result of preparation were determined from composite images of superimposed pre- and post-operative views. Preparation time varied significantly (P < 0.001) between the canal types; overall, 20 degrees canals were prepared more quickly than 40 degrees canals. Zips and elbows were observed in 16 out of the 40 canals with most (11) being created in 40 degrees specimens. Ledges were found in 19 canals and perforations in only 1. There were no significant differences between canal shapes for these aberrations. Excessive removal of material from the inner aspect of the canal at the curve to create a danger zone was found in 20 canals, but only in those with 40 degrees curves. Significant differences in total canal width between the canal types were seen at the zips (P < 0.05), elbows (P < 0.05) and danger zones (P < 0.001). Transportation at the danger zones varied significantly (P < 0.001) between canal types. Under the conditions of this study, the M4 handpiece and Safety Hedstrom files created hour-glass preparations in a substantial proportion of canals. In reality, the Safety Hedstrom file with its one flattened surface was ineffective at reducing removal of material along the inner aspect of canal curves in severely curved specimens and clearly has the potential to create strip perforations in teeth.
本研究的目的是评估M4往复式手机和安全H锉在模拟根管中的塑形能力。使用M4手机和安全H锉,以地面为导向,将锉的扁平表面朝向弯曲的内侧,制备了总共40个不同角度和弯曲位置的模拟根管。整个过程采用标准方案。用摄像机拍摄根管的术前和术后纵向图像,并存储在计算机中,使用图像分析软件进行处理。根据术前和术后叠加视图的合成图像,确定根管畸变的存在以及由于预备而去除的树脂材料的数量和位置。根管类型之间的预备时间差异显著(P<0.001);总体而言,20度根管的预备速度比40度根管更快。在40个根管中的16个中观察到拉链和肘状弯曲,其中大多数(11个)出现在40度的标本中。在19个根管中发现有台阶,仅1个有穿孔。这些畸变在根管形状之间没有显著差异。在20个根管中发现,在弯曲处从根管内侧过度去除材料以形成危险区,但仅在那些有40度弯曲的根管中出现。在拉链处(P<0.05)、肘状弯曲处(P<0.05)和危险区(P<0.001),根管类型之间的根管总宽度存在显著差异。危险区的根管偏移在根管类型之间差异显著(P<0.001)。在本研究条件下,M4手机和安全H锉在相当比例的根管中形成了沙漏形预备。实际上,带有一个扁平表面的安全H锉在减少严重弯曲标本中沿根管弯曲内侧的材料去除方面无效,并且显然有可能在牙齿中形成条状穿孔。