Davies B R, Millar B J, Wood D J, Bubb N L
Department of Conservative Dentistry, King's Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Quintessence Int. 1997 Jun;28(6):415-8.
A study was designed to simulate the repair of an indirect resin composite restoration with conventionally cured resin composite. Two-part specimens were prepared to test the diametral tensile strength of the repair interface between the base material of an indirectly cured resin composite (Herculite XRV) and repairs carried out with three directly cured materials (Herculite XRV, TPH, and Charisma). The repairs were carried out with and without use of the bonding resin for the repair material. The diametral tensile strengths of all repaired specimens were significantly less than those of bulk unrepaired specimens. There were no significant differences between the diametral tensile strengths of repaired blocks when the repair materials were used without bonding resin. The use of an intermediate layer of bonding resin significantly increased the bond strengths obtained when Herculite XRV and TPH were used for repair. There was no significant difference between the strength values of Herculite XRV and TPH, but Charisma exhibited the lowest strengths of repaired specimens.
一项研究旨在模拟使用传统固化树脂复合材料修复间接树脂复合材料修复体。制备了两部分试样,以测试间接固化树脂复合材料(Herculite XRV)的基础材料与使用三种直接固化材料(Herculite XRV、TPH和Charisma)进行的修复之间的修复界面的径向拉伸强度。修复过程中使用或不使用修复材料的粘结树脂。所有修复试样的径向拉伸强度均显著低于未修复的整体试样。当不使用粘结树脂使用修复材料时,修复块的径向拉伸强度之间没有显著差异。当使用Herculite XRV和TPH进行修复时,使用粘结树脂中间层显著提高了获得的粘结强度。Herculite XRV和TPH的强度值之间没有显著差异,但Charisma表现出修复试样的最低强度。