Tate W H, DeSchepper E J, Powers J M
Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Texas, Houston Health Science Center, Dental Branch.
Am J Dent. 1993 Aug;6(4):195-8.
Tensile bond strengths among three resin inlay cements and a light-cured and a post-cured hybrid composite prepared with two different surface treatments and three different bond-enhancing liquids were measured in vitro. The resin cements were bonded to sandblasted hybrid composite, stored at 37 degrees C in 100% humidity overnight, and debonded in tension. Interfacial bond strengths were affected most by the type of pre-bond surface treatment. Hydrofluoric acid produced weaker bond strengths than surface treatment with phosphoric acid. Post-cured Herculite XRV produced weaker bond strengths than the light-cured Herculite XRV. Porcelite cement produced the highest bond strengths. Of the surface enhancers, the acrylic monomer (Special Bond II) produced the highest bond strengths, regardless of which cement or surface preparation was used. Fracture analysis revealed mostly adhesive failures with hydrofluoric acid treatment in both light-cured and post-cured Herculite.
在体外测量了三种树脂嵌体水门汀以及通过两种不同表面处理和三种不同粘结增强液体制备的光固化和后固化混合复合材料之间的拉伸粘结强度。将树脂水门汀粘结到喷砂处理的混合复合材料上，在37℃、100%湿度下储存过夜，然后进行拉伸脱粘。界面粘结强度受粘结前表面处理类型的影响最大。氢氟酸产生的粘结强度低于磷酸表面处理。后固化的Herculite XRV产生的粘结强度低于光固化的Herculite XRV。Porcelite水门汀产生的粘结强度最高。在表面增强剂中，丙烯酸单体（Special Bond II）产生的粘结强度最高，无论使用哪种水门汀或表面处理。断裂分析显示，在光固化和后固化的Herculite中，氢氟酸处理大多导致粘结破坏。
