Nunes E V, Quitkin F M, Donovan S J, Deliyannides D, Ocepek-Welikson K, Koenig T, Brady R, McGrath P J, Woody G
Depression Evaluation Service, New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;55(2):153-60. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.2.153.
The literature is inconclusive on the role of antidepressant medications in treating drug dependence. Studies have either not focused on depressed patients or have selected patients with depressive disorders based on cross-sectional symptoms rather than a syndromal diagnosis. A clinical trial of an antidepressant was, therefore, conducted on drug-dependent patients with syndromal depression.
Patients receiving methadone hydrochloride maintenance treatment were selected if they met the criteria for a DSM-III-R depressive disorder that was chronologically primary, had persisted during a past abstinent period or was long-standing, and persisted during at least 1 month of stable methadone treatment. Subjects were randomized to a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of imipramine hydrochloride. A favorable response was defined as a Clinical Global Impression scale score for depression of 2 ("much improved") or 1 ("very much improved") and at least a 75% reduction in self-reported drug or alcohol use or abstinence.
One hundred thirty-seven patients were randomized, and 84 completed a minimum adequate trial of at least 6 weeks. Among the 84 adequately treated patients, 57% (24/42) receiving imipramine were rated as responders compared with 7% (3/42) receiving placebo (P < .001). On measures of mood, there was a robust effect of imipramine. Imipramine was superior to placebo on some self-reported measures of substance use and craving, and mood improvement was associated with improvement in self-reported substance use. However, few patients achieved urine-confirmed abstinence.
Imipramine was an effective antidepressant in patients receiving methadone who were selected via syndromal criteria for depressive illness. Imipramine may reduce substance abuse among patients whose mood improves; however, this effect was less robust.
关于抗抑郁药物在治疗药物依赖方面的作用,文献尚无定论。既往研究要么未聚焦于抑郁症患者,要么基于横断面症状而非综合征诊断来选择患有抑郁症的患者。因此,针对患有综合征性抑郁症的药物依赖患者开展了一项抗抑郁药物的临床试验。
选取接受美沙酮盐酸盐维持治疗且符合DSM-III-R抑郁症标准的患者,该抑郁症须为时间上首发、在过去戒断期持续存在或长期存在,且在至少1个月的稳定美沙酮治疗期间持续存在。将受试者随机分为接受12周盐酸丙咪嗪双盲、安慰剂对照试验的两组。良好反应定义为临床总体印象量表中抑郁评分为2(“明显改善”)或1(“非常显著改善”),且自我报告的药物或酒精使用减少至少75%或达到戒断状态。
137名患者被随机分组,84名完成了至少6周的最低充分试验。在这84名接受充分治疗的患者中,接受丙咪嗪治疗的患者有57%(24/42)被评为有反应者,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为7%(3/42)(P <.001)。在情绪测量方面,丙咪嗪有显著效果。在一些自我报告的物质使用和渴望测量指标上,丙咪嗪优于安慰剂,且情绪改善与自我报告的物质使用改善相关。然而,很少有患者实现尿样证实的戒断。
对于通过综合征标准选择出的患有抑郁症且接受美沙酮治疗的患者,丙咪嗪是一种有效的抗抑郁药物。丙咪嗪可能会减少情绪改善患者的物质滥用;然而,这种效果不太显著。