Gillet J L, Perrin M, Hiltbrand B, Bayon J M, Gobin J P, Calvignac J L, Grossetête C
Service d'Angiologie, Clinique du Grand-Large, Décines-Charpieu.
J Mal Vasc. 1997 Dec;22(5):330-5.
Does preoperative Duplex Scan (DS) allow to determine anatomy of the ending of the short saphenous vein (SSV), gastrocnemius vein (GV) and reflux in popliteal vein (PV), SSV and GV. Postoperative DS was performed to detect deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and GV thrombosis.
From June 94 to November 95 one hundred and eighty lower limbs operated for SSV were included consecutively and prospectively. Mean age in these 154 patients was 52 yr (24-80) with a sex ratio 4F/1M. An anatomical classification was previously defined. Type A: separate termination of SSV and GV; Type B: common ostium of SSV and GV in the popliteal vein; Type C: common trunk of the SSV and GV; Type D: Others. Forty-eight limbs (26.10%) had ligation of GV: 21 (11.10%) for reflux and 27 (16%) for anatomical or surgical reasons. Ten type A with GV reflux (10/31 = 32%) were not treated. Eighty two patients (45%) received preventive low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment including the 48 limbs whose GV were ligated.
Anatomical correlation between DS and surgery findings were calculated. Positive predictive values of DS in the different types were: A, 77%; B, 68%; C, 90%; D, 79%. That gave a global predictive value of 80%. Two limited DVT were identified in group D by postoperative DS (2/10 = 1.1%). These two patients had complete recanalization of PV without reflux. In the group of limbs which had ligation of GV we identified 37.5% of GV thrombosis. In the group without ligation of GV we found 3% of GV thrombosis.
Duplex scanning appears to be the investigation of choice before surgery for superficial vein incompetence in the popliteal fossa. It is a reliable investigation to determine termination patterns of SSV and GV (80%). It brings to the surgeon essential information which helps in the management of surgical procedure and particularly to ligation of gastrocnemius veins. But at this time there is no consensus on this point. The occurrence of DVT after SSV surgery including GV ligation was very low. Two questions remain: is anticoagulation necessary in all patients or selective after surgery of the SSV? is Duplex Scan mandatory during postoperative monitoring? On the basis of this study, one recommendation can be made: A routine postoperative DS is necessary after ligation of the GV or when the dissection of the popliteal fossa has been extensive (Type D).
术前双功超声扫描(DS)能否确定小隐静脉(SSV)、腓肠肌静脉(GV)的终末解剖结构以及腘静脉(PV)、SSV和GV的反流情况。术后进行DS以检测深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和GV血栓形成。
从1994年6月至1995年11月,连续前瞻性纳入180条接受SSV手术的下肢。这154例患者的平均年龄为52岁(24 - 80岁),性别比为4女/1男。此前已定义了一种解剖学分类。A型:SSV和GV分别终止;B型:SSV和GV在腘静脉中有共同开口;C型:SSV和GV的共同主干;D型:其他。48条肢体(26.10%)进行了GV结扎:21条(11.10%)因反流,27条(16%)因解剖或手术原因。10例A型伴有GV反流(10/31 = 32%)未接受治疗。82例患者(45%)接受了预防性低分子量肝素(LMWH)治疗,包括48条结扎了GV的肢体。
计算了DS与手术结果之间的解剖学相关性。DS在不同类型中的阳性预测值为:A型,77%;B型,68%;C型,90%;D型,79%。总体预测值为80%。术后DS在D组中发现2例局限性DVT(2/10 = 1.1%)。这两名患者的PV完全再通且无反流。在结扎了GV的肢体组中,我们发现GV血栓形成率为37.5%。在未结扎GV的肢体组中,我们发现GV血栓形成率为3%。
双功超声扫描似乎是术前检查腘窝浅表静脉功能不全的首选方法。它是确定SSV和GV终末模式的可靠检查(80%)。它为外科医生提供了重要信息,有助于手术操作的管理,特别是腓肠肌静脉的结扎。但目前在这一点上尚无共识。包括GV结扎在内的SSV手术后DVT的发生率非常低。仍有两个问题:所有患者术后都需要抗凝还是仅在SSV手术后选择性抗凝?术后监测期间双功超声扫描是否是必需的?基于本研究,可以提出一项建议:在结扎GV后或腘窝解剖范围广泛(D型)时,常规术后DS是必要的。