Measham A R, Villegas A
Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Sep;48(3):336-40.
The validation of reports of the performance of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) is fraught with confounding factors such as different protocols, populations, and clinic environments. Two-year life table continuation rates from a comparative study of the Lippes loop, TCu-200, and Dalkon shield are reported from a single clinic in which 1626 insertions were performed by two obstetrician/gynecologists. The difference between the highest and lowest parity-standardized continuation rates for the three devices was only 3.7 percentage points after 2 years of use. The TCu-200 and Dalkon shield yielded significantly lower expulson rates than the Lippes loop. The more recently developed IUDs do not appear to have higher continuation rates than the Lippes loop.
宫内节育器(IUD)性能报告的验证充满了各种混杂因素,如不同的方案、人群和临床环境。本文报告了在一家诊所对Lippes环、TCu - 200和Dalkon盾进行比较研究得出的两年生命表续用率,该诊所的两名妇产科医生共进行了1626例放置手术。使用两年后,三种节育器按产次标准化的最高续用率和最低续用率之间的差异仅为3.7个百分点。TCu - 200和Dalkon盾的脱落率明显低于Lippes环。最新开发的宫内节育器续用率似乎并不高于Lippes环。