• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前听力筛查:一份家长问卷的评估

Preschool hearing screening: evaluation of a parental questionnaire.

作者信息

Hammond P D, Gold M S, Wigg N R, Volkmer R E

机构信息

Child Health Research Institute, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 1997 Dec;33(6):528-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1997.tb01664.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1754.1997.tb01664.x
PMID:9484686
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity of a parental questionnaire used to screen preschool children for persistent hearing impairment.

METHODOLOGY

Six-hundred and eighty-five children aged 4-5 years from a Metropolitan area of Adelaide, Australia, were enrolled. Each parent completed a questionnaire aimed at detecting parental concerns about hearing impairment. Screening audiometry was then performed. Children who failed the initial audiometry screening underwent repeat audiometry screening 6-8 weeks later. The audiometry and questionnaire data were then compared.

RESULTS

Of the 657 children who successfully completed initial audiometry, 544 (83%) passed and 113 (17%) failed. Of the 84 children who had follow-up audiometry, 64 (76%) passed. Parental concerns were identified on questionnaire in 50% of all children. Neither individual questions nor the number of concerns were found to relate to audiometry results. Compared with audiometry results, the hearing screening questionnaire had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

The hearing questionnaire used in this study and in several Australian states is an ineffective screening test for detecting persistent hearing loss.

摘要

目的

评估一份用于筛查学龄前儿童持续性听力障碍的家长问卷的有效性。

方法

招募了来自澳大利亚阿德莱德市区的685名4至5岁儿童。每位家长都填写了一份旨在检测家长对听力障碍担忧的问卷。随后进行了听力筛查测听。初次听力筛查测听未通过的儿童在6至8周后接受了重复听力筛查测听。然后将测听数据和问卷数据进行了比较。

结果

在成功完成初次听力筛查测听的657名儿童中,544名(83%)通过,113名(17%)未通过。在接受后续听力筛查测听的84名儿童中,64名(76%)通过。在所有儿童中,50%的儿童家长在问卷中表达了担忧。未发现单个问题或担忧数量与测听结果有关。与测听结果相比,听力筛查问卷的灵敏度为56%,特异度为52%。

结论

本研究以及澳大利亚几个州所使用的听力问卷在检测持续性听力损失方面是一种无效的筛查测试。

相似文献

1
Preschool hearing screening: evaluation of a parental questionnaire.学龄前听力筛查:一份家长问卷的评估
J Paediatr Child Health. 1997 Dec;33(6):528-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1997.tb01664.x.
2
Evaluation of the use of a questionnaire to detect hearing loss in Kenyan pre-school children.肯尼亚学龄前儿童听力损失检测问卷使用情况评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Mar;57(3):229-34. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00453-5.
3
Evaluation of a hearing screening questionnaire for use with Ecuadorian school-aged children.一份用于厄瓜多尔学龄儿童的听力筛查问卷的评估。
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(9):587-92. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1015689. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
4
Is parental perception an accurate predictor of childhood hearing loss? A prospective study.父母的认知是儿童听力损失的准确预测指标吗?一项前瞻性研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Mar;120(3):340-4. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70272-X.
5
Hearing screening at well-child visits.健康儿童体检中的听力筛查。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Oct;159(10):949-55. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.10.949.
6
Otoacoustic emissions: a valid, efficient first-line hearing screen for preschool children.耳声发射:一种适用于学龄前儿童的有效、高效的一线听力筛查方法。
J Sch Health. 2009 Apr;79(4):147-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00383.x.
7
Evaluation of the use of a questionnaire by non-specialists to detect hearing loss in preschool Brazilian children.非专业人员使用问卷对巴西学龄前儿童听力损失进行检测的评估。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2005 Jun;28(2):171-4. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200506000-00012.
8
[Screening for hearing disorders in school children of Medellin, Colombia, 1993].[1993年哥伦比亚麦德林市学童听力障碍筛查]
Salud Publica Mex. 1994 Nov-Dec;36(6):670-2.
9
Screening for handicapping hearing loss in the elderly.老年人致残性听力损失的筛查。
J Fam Pract. 2003 Jan;52(1):56-62.
10
Alternatives in screening at school entry: comparison of the childhood middle ear disease and hearing questionnaire (CMEDHQ) and the pure tone sweep test.入学筛查的替代方法:儿童中耳疾病与听力问卷(CMEDHQ)和纯音扫频测试的比较
Br J Audiol. 1999 Dec;33(6):403-14. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000108.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and analysis of a low-cost screening tool to identify and classify hearing loss in children: a proposal for developing countries.开发和分析一种用于识别和分类儿童听力损失的低成本筛查工具:为发展中国家提出的建议。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(11):1943-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011001100015.