Bwire R, Slootman E J, Verhave J P, Bruins J, Docters van Leeuwen W M
Infectious Diseases Control Unit, Occupational Health and Safety Services, Royal Netherlands Army, Utrecht.
Trop Med Int Health. 1998 Jan;3(1):66-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00165.x.
One hundred and twenty-five Dutch servicemen returning from central Africa after a short deployment were enrolled in a study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of malaria prevention measures. None of the persons developed an episode of clinically overt malaria during or after deployment, and no antibodies against blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum could be found. However, antibodies against the circumsporozoite protein (CS) of P. falciparum were demonstrable in 14 persons (11.2% of the study population) by an ELISA test using the recombinant CS-antigen R32tet32, while one person only was positive in an IFA test based on schizonts of P. fieldi as antigen. We concluded that the anti-CS-positive servicemen were probably bitten by mosquitoes carrying P. falciparum parasites while the IFA-positive person was possibly infected by P. vivax, P. ovale or P. malariae parasites. There was no significant association between the different antimalaria preventive measures and the development of anti-CS antibodies. Therefore mefloquine prophylaxis as the single most widely used preventive measure in this group of servicemen was possibly a major contributing factor in averting development of overt malaria.
125名在中非短期服役后返回的荷兰军人参与了一项旨在评估疟疾预防措施效果的研究。在服役期间及之后,没有人出现临床显性疟疾发作,也未检测到针对恶性疟原虫血液阶段的抗体。然而,通过使用重组环子孢子蛋白(CS)抗原R32tet32的ELISA检测,在14人(占研究人群的11.2%)中检测到了针对恶性疟原虫环子孢子蛋白(CS)的抗体,而仅1人在以菲氏疟原虫裂殖体为抗原的间接荧光抗体试验(IFA)中呈阳性。我们得出结论,抗CS阳性的军人可能被携带恶性疟原虫的蚊子叮咬,而IFA阳性的人可能感染了间日疟原虫、卵形疟原虫或三日疟原虫。不同的抗疟疾预防措施与抗CS抗体的产生之间没有显著关联。因此,在这群军人中作为最广泛使用的单一预防措施的甲氟喹预防可能是避免显性疟疾发生的一个主要因素。