• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽管存在轻至中度肾功能衰竭,硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统的利钠作用依然存在。

The natriuretic effect of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system remains despite the presence of mild-to-moderate renal failure.

作者信息

Campo C, Garcia-Vallejo O, Barrios V, Lahera V, Manero M, Esteban E, Rodicio J L, Ruilope L M

机构信息

Unidad de Hipertensión, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1997 Dec;15(12 Pt 2):1803-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715120-00093.

DOI:10.1097/00004872-199715120-00093
PMID:9488243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers facilitate the renal excretion of sodium and this effect is maintained during chronic administration of these drugs. However, it is unknown whether this natriuretic effect remains despite the presence of a decreased renal function.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the natriuretic capacity of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and lisinopril in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic renal failure.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized, comparative study was conducted to compare the natriuretic capacity of nifedipine GITS and lisinopril in the presence of mild-to-moderate renal failure (creatinine clearance 30-80 ml/min). After a wash-out period of 4 weeks an intravenous saline infusion (30 ml/kg of body weight of isotonic saline in 4 h) was performed and repeated after 4 weeks of active therapy. Two sex- and age-matched groups of hypertensive patients (n = 25) were included in the study. Renal failure was diagnosed as secondary to nephrosclerosis in all the patients.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the renal capacity to excrete the sodium load was observed in patients receiving nifedipine GITS (n = 11) but not in those taking lisinopril (n = 13). Both drugs controlled blood pressure to a similar extent. No changes were observed in body weight, glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow (measured as inulin and paraaminohippurate clearances). A significant drop was observed in urinary albumin excretion after lisinopril, but not after nifedipine. Heart rate was higher in nifedipine group.

CONCLUSION

The natriuretic capacity of nifedipine GITS remains despite the presence of mild-to-moderate chronic renal failure. Such an effect takes place in the absence of changes in renal hemodynamics, suggesting that it is caused by a direct tubular effect.

摘要

背景

钙通道阻滞剂可促进肾脏排钠,且在长期使用这些药物期间这种作用持续存在。然而,肾功能减退时这种利钠作用是否依然存在尚不清楚。

目的

比较硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)与赖诺普利对轻至中度慢性肾衰竭患者的利钠能力。

方法

进行了一项开放标签、随机、对照研究,以比较硝苯地平GITS和赖诺普利在轻至中度肾衰竭(肌酐清除率30 - 80 ml/min)患者中的利钠能力。经过4周的洗脱期后,静脉输注生理盐水(4小时内输注30 ml/kg体重的等渗盐水),并在4周积极治疗后重复进行。研究纳入了两组性别和年龄匹配的高血压患者(n = 25)。所有患者的肾衰竭均诊断为继发于肾硬化症。

结果

接受硝苯地平GITS治疗的患者(n = 11)肾脏排泄钠负荷的能力显著增加,而服用赖诺普利的患者(n = 13)则未增加。两种药物对血压的控制程度相似。体重、肾小球滤过率和肾血浆流量(以菊粉和对氨基马尿酸清除率衡量)均未观察到变化。赖诺普利治疗后尿白蛋白排泄显著下降,而硝苯地平治疗后未出现这种情况。硝苯地平组心率较高。

结论

尽管存在轻至中度慢性肾衰竭,硝苯地平GITS的利钠能力依然存在。这种作用在肾血流动力学无变化的情况下发生,提示其由直接的肾小管效应引起。

相似文献

1
The natriuretic effect of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system remains despite the presence of mild-to-moderate renal failure.尽管存在轻至中度肾功能衰竭,硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统的利钠作用依然存在。
J Hypertens. 1997 Dec;15(12 Pt 2):1803-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715120-00093.
2
Changes in renal resistive index and urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive patients under long-term treatment with lisinopril or nifedipine GITS.长期接受赖诺普利或硝苯地平控释片治疗的高血压患者的肾阻力指数和尿白蛋白排泄量的变化
Nephron. 2002 Feb;90(2):169-73. doi: 10.1159/000049038.
3
Sustained improvement of renal graft function for two years in hypertensive renal transplant recipients treated with nifedipine as compared to lisinopril.与赖诺普利相比,硝苯地平治疗的高血压肾移植受者的肾移植功能持续改善两年。
Transplantation. 2001 Dec 15;72(11):1787-92. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200112150-00013.
4
A random comparison of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS in patients with primary renal disease.
J Hypertens. 2001 Oct;19(10):1871-6. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200110000-00023.
5
Comparison of the effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist in hypertensive, macroproteinuric diabetic patients: a randomised double-blind study.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与钙拮抗剂对高血压合并大量蛋白尿糖尿病患者疗效的比较:一项随机双盲研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1993 Aug;7(4):333-9.
6
[Comparison of treatment effects with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor--lisinopril and a calcium blocker--nifedipine retard on urinary albumin excretion in patients with non-complicated essential hypertension].血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利与钙通道阻滞剂硝苯地平缓释片对非复杂性原发性高血压患者尿白蛋白排泄治疗效果的比较
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 1995 Feb;93(2):135-42.
7
Comparison of nifedipine GITS and hydrochlorothiazide in the management of elderly patients with stage I-III diastolic hypertension.硝苯地平控释片与氢氯噻嗪治疗老年Ⅰ-Ⅲ期舒张期高血压的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Jun;9(6):598-606. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00168-9.
8
Reduction of left ventricular mass by lisinopril and nifedipine in hypertensive renal transplant recipients: a prospective randomized double-blind study.赖诺普利和硝苯地平对高血压肾移植受者左心室质量的降低作用:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Transplantation. 2001 Jul 15;72(1):107-11. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200107150-00021.
9
Natriuretic effect of calcium-channel blockers in hypertensives.钙通道阻滞剂对高血压患者的利钠作用。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1991 Nov;18(5):566-72. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80651-2.
10
Renal outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel blocker vs a diuretic: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂与利尿剂治疗高危高血压患者的肾脏转归:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)报告
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Apr 25;165(8):936-46. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.8.936.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic Kidney Disease Progression Risk in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Using Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers: A Nationwide, Population-Based, Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.使用二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂的糖尿病患者慢性肾脏病进展风险:一项基于全国人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 9;13:786203. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.786203. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of Nifedipine on Renal and Cardiovascular Responses to Neuropeptide Y in Anesthetized Rats.硝苯地平对麻醉大鼠神经肽 Y 肾和心血管反应的影响。
Molecules. 2021 Jul 24;26(15):4460. doi: 10.3390/molecules26154460.
3
Effects of calcium channel blockers comparing to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease stage 3 to 5 and dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂相比,钙通道阻滞剂对高血压合并慢性肾脏病3至5期及透析患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0188975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188975. eCollection 2017.