Thomas R E
Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Med Educ. 1997 Sep;31(5):320-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1997.00671.x.
Problem-based learning (PBL) could potentially contribute to four key objectives in the education of doctors. (1) Motivating learning. Three studies show that students studying PBL problems choose fewer topics to study than those identified by the faculty, but one study of a critical care rotation showed that students were motivated to learn over a wider range of basic science topics than had been included in the basic science curriculum. (2) Developing clinical reasoning. One study compared methods of solving problems in PBL and conventional track curricula and suggested that PBL students work backwards from clinical information to theory, while conventional curriculum students tend to reason forward from theory. One study showed that computer searches provide knowledge for helping solve some PBL problems, and another study showed that specific knowledge in emergency medicine correlated with test scores. (3) Structuring knowledge in clinical contexts. A few studies show that PBL students perform less well on basic science examinations but better on clinical examinations. Educational outcomes, however, have been assessed quantitatively mainly by the U.S. National Boards of Medical Examiners Examinations or by clinical examinations with small samples. Only one study includes a power computation to assess type II error. There are no studies that examine how much variance occurs between PBL programmes in their curricular methods and outcomes. (4) Developing self learning skills. PBL students use a much wider range and number of resources than conventional track students. There is only one study comparing the knowledge of doctors trained by PBL and conventional curricula after the doctors have been in practice for a substantial number of years, and no studies of patient outcomes. Patient outcomes need to be assessed with randomized controlled trials, and sample sizes should be determined by power computations to avoid Type II error. Four possible methods of improving PBL would be to derive national and internationally accepted PBL curricula; to organize internationally accepted and psychometrically validated methods of evaluation; to develop attitudes among students and tutors to facilitate co-operative PBL teamwork; and to teach group process diagnostic skills.
基于问题的学习(PBL)可能有助于实现医生教育中的四个关键目标。(1)激发学习动力。三项研究表明,学习PBL问题的学生选择学习的主题比教师确定的主题少,但一项关于重症监护轮转的研究表明,与基础科学课程中包含的主题相比,学生有动力在更广泛的基础科学主题上学习。(2)培养临床推理能力。一项研究比较了PBL和传统课程中解决问题的方法,结果表明,PBL学生从临床信息反向推理至理论,而传统课程的学生则倾向于从理论正向推理。一项研究表明,计算机搜索可为解决一些PBL问题提供知识,另一项研究表明,急诊医学方面的特定知识与考试成绩相关。(3)在临床情境中构建知识体系。一些研究表明,PBL学生在基础科学考试中的表现较差,但在临床考试中的表现较好。然而,教育成果主要通过美国国家医学考试委员会考试或小样本临床考试进行定量评估。只有一项研究进行了功效计算以评估II类错误。没有研究考察PBL课程在课程方法和成果方面存在多大差异。(4)培养自主学习技能。PBL学生使用的资源范围和数量比传统课程的学生广泛得多。只有一项研究比较了接受PBL培训和传统课程培训的医生在从业多年后的知识水平,且没有关于患者预后的研究。需要通过随机对照试验评估患者预后,样本量应由功效计算确定,以避免II类错误。改进PBL的四种可能方法是制定国家和国际认可的PBL课程;组织国际认可且经过心理测量验证的评估方法;培养学生和导师的态度,以促进合作性的PBL团队合作;教授小组过程诊断技能。