Mairinger T, Netzer T, Gschwendtner A, Markl C
Department of Pathology, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3(3):154-7. doi: 10.1258/1357633971931066.
Searches were conducted of two legal databases dealing with civil law in Austria. The searches produced 12 references relevant to telemedicine, which were obtained from a university legal library. From the literature, it can be concluded that Austrian civil regulations are sufficient to clarify the questions of liability arising in connection with the practice of telemedicine. Although no specific legislation has been enacted as yet, we would not expect such legislation to produce different results in the legal assessment of the case patterns discussed in this paper.
我们检索了奥地利两个处理民法的法律数据库。检索结果产生了12篇与远程医疗相关的参考文献,这些文献来自一所大学的法律图书馆。从文献中可以得出结论,奥地利的民事法规足以澄清与远程医疗实践相关的责任问题。虽然目前尚未颁布具体立法,但我们预计此类立法在对本文所讨论的案例模式进行法律评估时不会产生不同结果。