Netzer T, Mairinger T, Gschwendtner A, Mikuz G, Markl C
Institut für Pathologische Anatomie, Universität Innsbruck.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;108(17):555-9.
The rapid development of modern communication technologies offers new opportunities for medical diagnosis and treatment. In spite of the obvious theoretical benefits of telemedicine, which have been proven by many projects in practice, telemedicine has not become generally established in Europe. Besides lack of technical standardisation and high purchase costs, one of the reasons might be the as yet unclarified legal situation. Taking the present legal situation in Austria we tried to explore questions of liability concerning telemedicine. The outstanding point seems to lie in the contract between the participating physicians on the one hand and between the physicians and the patient on the other hand. If the consulting physician is self-employed he has to take responsibility for any error on the part of the consulted physician. However, if he is working in a hospital, then he is legally considered an "Erfüllungsgehilfe" (person employed by the debtor in the performance of his obligation) an any further doctor consulted is automatically also an "Erfüllungsgehilfe" of the hospital and therefore the hospital takes responsibility for any mistakes made by the consulted physician. Although there has not been any specific jurisdiction concerning telemedicine in Austria, the present legal provisions are adequate for reaching decisions on questions of liability, so that there are no objections from the legal point of view to the general implementation of telemedicine.
现代通信技术的迅速发展为医学诊断和治疗提供了新机遇。尽管远程医疗在理论上有诸多明显益处,且已被众多项目实践所证明,但在欧洲,远程医疗尚未得到普遍确立。除了缺乏技术标准化和高昂的购置成本外,原因之一可能是法律状况仍未明确。以奥地利目前的法律状况为例,我们试图探讨远程医疗的责任问题。关键似乎在于参与的医生之间以及医生与患者之间的合同。如果咨询医生是个体经营者,他必须对被咨询医生的任何失误负责。然而,如果他在医院工作,那么从法律角度看,他被视为“履行协助人”(债务人在履行义务时雇佣的人员),任何进一步被咨询的医生自动也成为医院的“履行协助人”,因此医院要对被咨询医生所犯的任何错误负责。尽管奥地利尚无关于远程医疗的具体管辖权规定,但现行法律条款足以就责任问题做出裁决,所以从法律角度来看,对远程医疗的普遍实施不存在异议。