Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of systolic mitral leaflet displacement among patients with mitral valve prolapse.

Though qualitative transthoracic echocardiographic criteria for abnormal systolic leaflet motion are widely accepted as diagnostic characteristics of mitral valve prolapse, transesophageal echocardiographic criteria have not been evaluated against such a standard. Because transesophageal imaging planes are not identical to transthoracic imaging planes, validation of transesophageal echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse is needed. Eleven patients with mitral valve prolapse (based on physical findings and transthoracic echocardiographic criteria) and 11 healthy persons underwent prospective transesophageal echocardiography in two orthogonal imaging planes. Measurements of maximal leaflet displacement superior to the annular hinge points and mitral prolapse area subtended by the displaced mitral leaflets and the chord connecting the annular hinge points were performed in triplicate and averaged by a blinded observer. Though maximal systolic leaflet displacement was greater among patients with mitral valve prolapse than healthy subjects for both the transesophageal four-chamber (0.66+/-0.39 cm versus 0.05+/-0.11 cm, p < 0.001) and two chamber views (0.57+/-0.44 cm versus 0.20+/-0.25 cm, p < 0.04), no unique value differentiated patients with from those without mitral valve prolapse. Mitral prolapse area was greater for patients with mitral valve prolapse than for healthy subjects in both transesophageal four-chamber (1.23+/-1.18 cm2 versus 0.03+/-0.06 cm2, p < 0.02) and two-chamber views (1.73+/-1.65 cm2 versus 0.21+/-0.31 cm2, p < 0.02). Whereas a mitral prolapse area of 0.20 cm2 uniquely differentiated patients with from those without mitral valve prolapse in the four-chamber view, data overlap prevented determination of a similar diagnostic criterion for the two-chamber view. The difficulty in defining quantitative transesophageal echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse based on leaflet displacement alone suggested that the simple qualitative observation of leaflet displacement above the annular hinge points should not be used as a defining morphologic criterion for mitral valve prolapse.