Berger A K, Edris D W, Breall J A, Oetgen W J, Marciniak T A, Molinari G F
Institute for Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Am Heart J. 1998 Feb;135(2 Pt 1):349-56. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70104-8.
This study sought to evaluate the quality of care rendered to Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction by establishing the use patterns of well-proven therapies in this population. We analyzed the quality of care rendered to 4300 Medicare beneficiaries seen at Maryland and District of Columbia hospitals with retrospectively confirmed acute myocardial infarction by evaluating the use of proven therapies. The proportion of patients ideal for therapies ranged from 10% for reperfusion to 100% for smoking cessation counseling. For ideal patients the following therapies were implemented: aspirin (87%), reperfusion therapy (64%), beta-blockers on discharge (60%), and smoking cessation counseling (41%). A substantial proportion of Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction has one or more relative or absolute contraindications to standard regimens and therefore are not ideal therapeutic candidates. In the group of ideal patients, those with no therapeutic contraindications, a significant proportion do not receive these treatments.
本研究旨在通过确定该人群中已充分证实的疗法的使用模式,评估为患有急性心肌梗死的医疗保险受益人提供的护理质量。我们通过评估已证实疗法的使用情况,分析了马里兰州和哥伦比亚特区医院收治的4300名经回顾性确诊患有急性心肌梗死的医疗保险受益人的护理质量。适合接受各种疗法的患者比例从再灌注治疗的10%到戒烟咨询的100%不等。对于理想患者,实施了以下疗法:阿司匹林(87%)、再灌注治疗(64%)、出院时使用β受体阻滞剂(60%)以及戒烟咨询(41%)。相当一部分患有急性心肌梗死的医疗保险患者对标准治疗方案存在一种或多种相对或绝对禁忌证,因此并非理想的治疗对象。在理想患者组中,即那些没有治疗禁忌证的患者,仍有相当比例未接受这些治疗。