One-two rural residency tracks in family practice: are they getting the job done?

BACKGROUND

In the 1990s, the Residency Review Committee for Family Practice (RRCFP) and the American Board of Family Practice used the development of rural training programs as a strategy to bridge training experiences across urban referral centers and rural community hospitals. These programs are relatively small and attract trainees who are predisposed to rural practice. Aggregating data from several programs yields insight about their challenges and their ability to produce graduates who enter rural practice.

METHODS

This descriptive analysis is based on self-reported data from a 1996 survey mailed to the residency program directors of rural training programs, identified by the RRCFP office as one-two programs.

RESULTS

More than half of the rural training programs surveyed were located in health professions shortage areas, most in communities with little urban influence. These programs are equally likely to be sponsored by university- or community-based residency programs. Most (75%) placed two or fewer residents per year in the rural site; minorities accounted for 4% of placements. Thirty percent of programs report unfilled positions. Seventy-five percent use televideo communications and find experiences in surgery and obstetrics relatively easy to arrange but dermatology and critical care difficult. Seventy-six percent of graduates enter rural practice after graduation.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey suggests that family practice rural one-two residencies are meeting the goal of providing trainees with a rural immersion experience, in anticipation of selecting rural practice after graduation.