Abuzeid S T, Ezzat K M, Seef R E, Mohsen M M
Endodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
Egypt Dent J. 1995 Oct;41(4):1367-72.
Forty freshly single rooted teeth were selected for this study. The coronal part of teeth were decapitated and the root canals were prepared by modified step-back technique with K-flex files to size 35# at the apex, five ml of 5.25% NaOCl was used as irrigating solution. According to the dentin thickness at the mesio-distal direction of the prepared roots, roots were divided into two groups: Group (I), dentin and cementum thickness from 1.5-2 mm, and Group (II), dentin and cementum thickness 1 mm. According to the filling technique used the teeth were subdivided into four subgroups each of five teeth; Subgroup (A) single gutta-percha cone and Ketac-endo root canal sealer, Subgroup (B) lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha and Ketac-endo sealer, Subgroup (C) laterally condensed gutta-percha with Roth 801 cement and Subgroup (D) teeth left unfilled as negative controls. The prepared roots were placed into acrylic resin so that 10 mm of the root was exposed. A slowly increasing force was applied vertically using a blunt punch with 1 mm tip thickness attached to Instron testing machine. The results showed that group (I) with 1.5-2mm dentin thickness required greater force to fracture in all experimental groups, than that of group (II) with 1 mm dentin thickness. So the amount of remaining dentin thickness significantly affected the resistance to fracture of the prepared roots.
本研究选取了40颗新鲜的单根牙。将牙冠部分截除,使用K-flex锉采用改良逐步后退技术预备根管至根尖处为35#,用5毫升5.25%的次氯酸钠作为冲洗液。根据预备后牙根近远中方向的牙本质厚度,将牙根分为两组:第一组(I组),牙本质和牙骨质厚度为1.5 - 2毫米;第二组(II组),牙本质和牙骨质厚度为1毫米。根据所使用的充填技术,将牙齿再细分为四个亚组,每组五颗牙;亚组(A)单根牙胶尖和Ketac-endo根管封闭剂;亚组(B)牙胶尖侧方加压充填技术和Ketac-endo封闭剂;亚组(C)牙胶尖侧方加压充填并使用Roth 801水门汀;亚组(D)牙齿不做充填作为阴性对照。将预备好的牙根放入丙烯酸树脂中,使10毫米的牙根暴露在外。使用Instron测试机,通过连接一个尖端厚度为1毫米的钝头冲头垂直施加逐渐增大的力。结果显示,在所有实验组中,牙本质厚度为1.5 - 2毫米的第一组(I组)比牙本质厚度为1毫米的第二组(II组)需要更大的力才能折断。因此,剩余牙本质的厚度显著影响预备后牙根的抗折性。