LaCasse R A, Follis K E, Moudgil T, Trahey M, Binley J M, Planelles V, Zolla-Pazner S, Nunberg J H
Montana Biotechnology Center, The University of Montana, Missoula 59812, USA.
J Virol. 1998 Mar;72(3):2491-5. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.3.2491-2495.1998.
We have examined the relationship between coreceptor utilization and sensitivity to neutralization in a primary isolate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and its T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) derivative. We determined that adaptation of the primary-isolate (PI) virus 168P results in the loss of the unique capacity of PI viruses to utilize the CCR5 coreceptor and in the acquisition by the TCLA 168C virus of sensitivity to neutralization by V3-directed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). In experiments wherein infection by 168P is directed via either the CCR5 or the CXCR4 pathway, we demonstrate that the virus, as well as pseudotyped virions bearing a molecularly cloned 168P envelope protein, remains refractory to neutralization by MAbs 257-D, 268-D, and 50.1 regardless of the coreceptor utilized. This study suggests that coreceptor utilization is not a primary determinant of differential neutralization sensitivity in PI and TCLA viruses.
我们研究了1型人类免疫缺陷病毒的一株原代分离株及其T细胞系适应株(TCLA)中辅助受体利用与中和敏感性之间的关系。我们确定,原代分离株(PI)病毒168P的适应性变化导致PI病毒利用CCR5辅助受体的独特能力丧失,以及TCLA 168C病毒获得对V3定向单克隆抗体(MAb)中和的敏感性。在通过CCR5或CXCR4途径进行168P感染的实验中,我们证明,该病毒以及携带分子克隆的168P包膜蛋白的假型病毒颗粒,无论使用何种辅助受体,对MAb 257-D、268-D和50.1的中和均具有抗性。这项研究表明,辅助受体的利用不是PI和TCLA病毒中和敏感性差异的主要决定因素。