• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Prospective and comparative study of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime in appendicitis surgery].

作者信息

Sanz Villa N, Alvarez Bernaldo de Quirós M, Cortés Gómez M J, Omeñaca C

机构信息

Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Niño Jesús, Madrid.

出版信息

An Esp Pediatr. 1997 Sep;47(3):279-84.

PMID:9499281
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Acute appendicitis is the most common acute surgical disease in childhood and it still presents frequent septic complications. This prospective and randomized study compares the efficacy of two cephalosporins (cefoxitin and ceftizoxime) in terms of clinical response, in vitro activity and characteristics of use in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 288 children with acute appendicitis admitted over a period of 15 months, 148 received cefoxitin (100 mg/kg/24 h; Group I) and 140 ceftizoxime (100 mg/kg/24 h; Group II) RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between these two groups in clinical response or infectious complication rates. In addition, activities of both antimicrobial agents against pathogens recovered from the peritoneal cultures of all patients were similar. The overall most common isolates were E. coli (75.5%), bacteroides species (33.7%) and Pseudomonas (32.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that ceftizoxime is as effective as cefoxitin and can be surely employed in the treatment of acute appendicitis in children. Its addition, its longer half-life simplifies its use in clinical practice.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Prospective and comparative study of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime in appendicitis surgery].
An Esp Pediatr. 1997 Sep;47(3):279-84.
2
Interchangeability of ceftizoxime and cefoxitin: a clinical perspective.
Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl C:74-9.
3
Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis with peritonitis: treatment and bacteriology.坏疽性及穿孔性阑尾炎伴腹膜炎:治疗与细菌学
Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl C:31-44.
4
Can oral metronidazole substitute parenteral drug therapy in acute appendicitis? A new policy in the management of simple or complicated appendicitis with localized peritonitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.口服甲硝唑能否替代急性阑尾炎的胃肠外给药治疗?一项针对伴有局限性腹膜炎的单纯性或复杂性阑尾炎治疗的新政策:一项随机对照临床试验。
Am Surg. 1999 May;65(5):411-6.
5
Treatment and long-term follow-up of foot infections in patients with diabetes or ischemia: a randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime.
Clin Ther. 1987;10 Suppl A:36-49.
6
One-drug versus two-drug antibiotic therapy in pediatric perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized study.小儿穿孔性阑尾炎的单药与两药联合抗生素治疗:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surgery. 1991 Oct;110(4):764-7; discussion 767-8.
7
Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial program of single-dose ceftizoxime versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis for patients undergoing vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.单剂量头孢唑肟与多剂量头孢西丁用于阴道和腹部子宫切除术患者预防性治疗的双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验项目结果
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Feb;178(2):123-31.
8
Single-dose cefotetan or cefoxitin versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute nonperforated appendicitis.单剂量头孢替坦或头孢西丁与多剂量头孢西丁用于急性非穿孔性阑尾炎阑尾切除术患者预防感染的比较
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):77-80.
9
Comparison of single-dose ceftizoxime with multidose cefoxitin chemoprophylaxis for patients undergoing hysterectomy.
Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl C:45-52.
10
Moxalactam therapy for bacterial infections.莫西拉坦治疗细菌感染。
Arch Intern Med. 1981 Nov;141(12):1607-12.