Ludwig K, Wuschek M, Lorenz D
Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald.
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(12):1078-82.
By introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, an increase of accidental common bile duct injuries up to 1.2% has been reported. In the present study of 325 cholecystectomies we evaluated whether mandatory intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) can reduce the rate of accidental bile duct injuries or, at least, identify them early in order to make an adequate repair possible. In addition 163 patients underwent preoperative intravenous cholangiography (IVC). Both imaging techniques were compared with regard to their sensitivity in the detection of anatomic variations and stones of the extrahepatic bile duct system. Our results demonstrated a great advantage of the IOC. The IOC was feasible in 98.1% of the cases and presented a complete depiction of the extrahepatic bile duct system in 99.3%. IVCs showed the biliary system in 91.4% of the cases but without visualization of the cystic duct in 51.5% and the hepatic confluence in 16%. Anatomic variations of the bile duct system which consecutively influenced the operative management were found in additional 27.6% exclusively by IOC. 71.4% of bile duct stones were not detected by IVC. The intraoperative time consumption of IOC was unimportant. The x-ray-load was clearly lower by a factor of 3.5. There was no complication after IOC. In comparison, 6.1% of patients demonstrated an anaphylactic reaction by IVC. One common duct injury (0.3%) was detected intraoperatively by IOC and at the same operation treated without postoperative complications. In conclusion, we recommend an IOC in addition to a thorough preoperative ultrasound-examination. By this technique intraoperatively identified stones of the common bile duct can be sufficiently treated by postoperative endoscopic extraction and anatomic variations of the bile duct system will be visualized and therefore accidental injuries will be avoided.
随着腹腔镜胆囊切除术的引入,据报道意外性胆总管损伤的发生率增加至1.2%。在本项对325例胆囊切除术的研究中,我们评估了术中强制性胆管造影(IOC)是否能降低意外胆管损伤的发生率,或者至少能早期识别这些损伤以便进行适当修复。此外,163例患者接受了术前静脉胆管造影(IVC)。对这两种成像技术在检测肝外胆管系统解剖变异和结石方面的敏感性进行了比较。我们的结果显示IOC具有很大优势。IOC在98.1%的病例中可行,99.3%能完整显示肝外胆管系统。IVC在91.4%的病例中显示了胆道系统,但51.5%未显示胆囊管,16%未显示肝门汇合处。仅通过IOC还发现另外27.6%的胆管系统解剖变异会对手术管理产生影响。IVC未检测出71.4%的胆管结石。IOC的术中时间消耗并不重要。X线负荷明显降低了3.5倍。IOC后无并发症。相比之下,6.1%的患者在IVC时有过敏反应。术中通过IOC检测到1例胆总管损伤(0.3%),并在同一手术中进行治疗,术后无并发症。总之,除了进行全面的术前超声检查外,我们建议进行IOC。通过这种技术,术中识别出的胆总管结石可在术后通过内镜取出得到充分治疗,胆管系统的解剖变异将得以显示,从而避免意外损伤。