Suppr超能文献

[腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的术中胆管造影及顺行胆管探查——技术、结果、展望]

[Intraoperative cholangiography and anterograde bile duct exploration in laparoscopic cholecystectomy--technique, results, perspectives].

作者信息

Neufang T, Lüdtke F E, Bartkowski R, Brüggemann A, Lepsien G

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemeinchirurgie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 1994;119(6):388-414.

PMID:8091877
Abstract

The avoidance of (unrecognized) bile duct injuries (1) and the management of bile duct stones (pre-, intra- or postoperatively?) (2) are believed to be the main problems in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCE) at present. They must be a challenge for surgery to develop and improve the concepts of minimally invasive therapy for treatment of cholelithiasis. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) plays a very important role and is the basis of innovative, laparoscopically assisted procedures (3) for single session therapy of gallbladder and bile duct stones. (1) A detailed analysis of the literature proves the value of IOC for avoidance or early recognition of iatrogenic bile duct injuries. IOC is of most importance to compensate fundamental restrictions of the laparoscopic technique (missing possibility for palpation or anterograde preparation). IOC adds additional safety to the laparoscopic procedure and detects unsuspected bile duct stones. (2) At present, surgical management of cholecysto-/choledocholithiasis is split in two independent procedures: LCE and pre- or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with optional endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). A critical analysis of the literature and of the results of 623 LCE performed between 10/91 and 9/93 in the own institution leads to the following conclusions: Preoperative ERCs are performed unnecessary in about 50% of cases. They could be avoided by routine use of IOC. The combination of two independent procedures (LCE and ERC/PT) for treatment of cholelithiasis increases mortality and morbidity. Thus, the outcome of "therapeutic splitting" is not clearly superior to conventional treatment by open surgery.2+ common bile duct exploration allows final diagnosis and treatment in a single session. Additional risks and costs caused by choledochotomy as well as by pre- or post-operative endoscopic retrograde procedures (ERC, EPT) are avoided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

避免(未被识别的)胆管损伤(1)以及胆管结石的处理(术前、术中还是术后?)(2)被认为是目前腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LCE)的主要问题。它们必定是外科手术在发展和完善胆石症微创治疗理念方面的一项挑战。术中胆管造影(IOC)起着非常重要的作用,并且是创新的腹腔镜辅助手术(3)用于胆囊和胆管结石单次治疗的基础。(1)对文献的详细分析证明了IOC在避免或早期识别医源性胆管损伤方面的价值。IOC对于弥补腹腔镜技术的基本局限性(无法触诊或进行顺行准备)至关重要。IOC为腹腔镜手术增加了额外的安全性,并能检测出未被怀疑的胆管结石。(2)目前,胆囊/胆总管结石的外科治疗分为两个独立的手术:LCE以及术前或术后内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)并选择性地进行内镜乳头切开术(EPT)。对文献以及1991年10月至1993年9月在本机构进行的623例LCE结果的批判性分析得出以下结论:大约50%的病例中术前ERC是不必要的。通过常规使用IOC可以避免。用于治疗胆石症的两个独立手术(LCE和ERC/PT)相结合会增加死亡率和发病率。因此,“治疗性分割”的结果并不明显优于传统的开放手术治疗。胆总管探查术可在单次手术中完成最终诊断和治疗。避免了胆总管切开术以及术前或术后内镜逆行手术(ERC、EPT)所带来的额外风险和费用。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验