Xia X
Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, University of Hong Kong.
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Mar;15(3):336-44. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025930.
Substitution rates at the three codon positions (r1, r2, and r3) of mammalian mitochondrial genes are in the order of r3 > r1 > r2, and the rate heterogeneity at the three positions, as measured by the shape parameter of the gamma distribution (alpha 1, alpha 2, and alpha 3), is in the order of alpha 3 > alpha 1 > alpha 2. The causes for the rate heterogeneity at the three codon positions remain unclear and, in particular, there has been no satisfactory explanation for the observation of alpha 1 > alpha 2. I attempted to dissect the causes of rate heterogeneity by studying the pattern of nonsynonymous substitutions with respect to codon positions in 10 mitochondrial genes from 19 mammalian species. Nonsynonymous substitutions involve more different amino acid replacements at the second than at the first codon position, which results in r1 > r2. The difference between r1 and r2 increases with the intensity of purifying selection, and so does the rate heterogeneity in nonsynonymous substitutions among sites at the same codon position. All mitochondrial genes appear to have functionally important and unimportant codons, with the latter having all three codon positions prone to nonsynonymous substitutions. Within the functionally important codons, the second codon position is much more conservative than the codon position. This explains why alpha 1 > alpha 2. The result suggests that overweighting of the second codon position in phylogenetic analysis may be a misguided practice.
哺乳动物线粒体基因三个密码子位置(r1、r2和r3)的替换率顺序为r3 > r1 > r2,通过伽马分布的形状参数(α1、α2和α3)衡量的这三个位置的速率异质性顺序为α3 > α1 > α2。三个密码子位置速率异质性的原因仍不清楚,特别是对于α1 > α2这一观察结果尚无令人满意的解释。我试图通过研究19种哺乳动物10个线粒体基因中密码子位置的非同义替换模式来剖析速率异质性的原因。非同义替换在第二个密码子位置比在第一个密码子位置涉及更多不同的氨基酸替换,这导致r1 > r2。r1和r2之间的差异随着纯化选择强度的增加而增大,同一密码子位置位点间非同义替换的速率异质性也是如此。所有线粒体基因似乎都有功能重要和不重要的密码子,后者的所有三个密码子位置都容易发生非同义替换。在功能重要的密码子中,第二个密码子位置比其他密码子位置保守得多。这就解释了为什么α1 > α2。结果表明,在系统发育分析中对第二个密码子位置的过度加权可能是一种错误做法。